Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review

被引:5
作者
Fadel, Michael G. [1 ,2 ]
Ahmed, Mosab [2 ]
Pellino, Gianluca [3 ,4 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Tekkis, Paris [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Nicol, David [6 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Mayer, Erik [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, London SW10 9NH, England
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Adv Med & Surg Sci, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[4] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Colorectal Unit, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[5] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, London SW3 6JJ, England
[6] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Acad Urol, London SW3 6JJ, England
关键词
lymph node dissection; colorectal cancer; metastasis; disease-free survival; recurrence; LIVER METASTASES; CURATIVE RESECTION; OPERATIVE SALVAGE; LUNG METASTASES; GUIDED SURGERY; RECURRENCE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15020455
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (RPLNM) occurs in up to 6% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In general, there is no consensus on the treatment paradigm or optimal management of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in CRC patients, necessitating a systematic review of the literature to evaluate preoperative imaging modalities, perioperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens, and oncological outcomes of RPLND in CRC. Nineteen studies of 541 patients were included. Based on this systematic review and analysis, RPLND is a feasible treatment option with limited morbidity and possible oncological benefit for both synchronous and metachronous RPLNM in CRC. Future prospective clinical trials are required in order to establish further evidence for RPLND in the context of RPLNM in CRC. The benefits and prognosis of RPLND in CRC have not yet been fully established. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the outcomes for CRC patients with RPLNM undergoing RPLND. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCare, and CINAHL identified studies from between January 1990 and June 2022 that reported data on clinical outcomes for patients who underwent RPLND for RPLNM in CRC. The following primary outcome measures were derived: postoperative morbidity, disease free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and re-recurrence. Nineteen studies with a total of 541 patients were included. Three hundred and sixty-three patients (67.1%) had synchronous RPLNM and 178 patients (32.9%) had metachronous RPLNM. Perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 496 (91.7%) patients. The median DFS was 8.6-38.0 months and 5-year DFS was 24.4% (10.0-60.5%). The median OS was 25.0-83.0 months and 5-year OS was 47.0% (15.0-87.5%). RPLND is a feasible treatment option with limited morbidity and possible oncological benefit for both synchronous and metachronous RPLNM in CRC. Further prospective clinical trials are required to establish a better evidence base for RPLND in the context of RPLNM in CRC and to understand the timing of RPLND in a multimodality pathway in order to optimise treatment outcomes for this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Role of radiomics in predicting lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: a systematic review [J].
Micciche, Francesco ;
Rizzo, Gianluca ;
Casa, Calogero ;
Leone, Mariavittoria ;
Quero, Giuseppe ;
Boldrini, Luca ;
Bulajic, Milutin ;
Corsi, Domenico Cristiano ;
Tondolo, Vincenzo .
FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
[22]   Factors Predictive of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer [J].
Urzal, Cecilia ;
Sousa, Rita ;
Baltar, Vitor ;
Correia, Paulo ;
Cruz, Eugenia ;
Pereira da Silva, Daniel .
ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2014, 27 (01) :82-87
[23]   Influence of primary lymph node status of colorectal cancer on the development of pulmonary metastases and thoracic lymph node metastases [J].
Hofmann, H. -S. ;
Doblinger, C. ;
Szoeke, T. ;
Grosser, C. ;
Potzger, T. ;
Ried, M. ;
Neu, R. .
CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (05) :403-410
[24]   Contemporary Lymph Node Counts During Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection [J].
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Carver, Brett S. ;
Bosl, George J. ;
Bajorin, Dean ;
Motzer, Robert ;
Feldman, Darren R. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Sheinfeld, Joel .
UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (02) :368-372
[25]   The Significance of Skip Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer [J].
Song, Bolun ;
Wang, Liming ;
Chen, Yinggang ;
Hirano, Yasumitsu .
ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (09) :4169-4177
[26]   More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer [J].
Mao, Weipu ;
Huang, Xin ;
Kong, Minghao ;
Fan, Jie ;
Geng, Jiang .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 51 (04) :641-654
[27]   Surgical extent of central lymph node dissection in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid cancer [J].
Kim, Wan Wook ;
Park, Ho Yong ;
Jung, Jin Hyang .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (11) :1616-1620
[28]   Survivorship Post-Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Metastatic Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review [J].
Calpin, Gavin G. ;
O'Sullivan, Niall J. ;
Hehir, Cian ;
Thomas, Arun Z. ;
Casey, Rowan G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 32 (09) :1129-1136
[29]   Actual standards and controversies on operative technique and lymph node dissection in colorectal cancer [J].
Bruch, HP ;
Schwandner, O ;
Schiedeck, THK ;
Roblick, UJ .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 384 (02) :167-175
[30]   Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes [J].
Shishido, Toshihide ;
Okegawa, Takatsugu ;
Hayashi, Kenjiro ;
Masuda, Kazuki ;
Taguchi, Satoru ;
Nakamura, Yu ;
Tambo, Mitsuhiro ;
Fukuhara, Hiroshi .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 9 (02) :119-124