Economic inequality breeds corrupt behaviour

被引:3
作者
Wei, Cong [1 ]
Dang, Jianning [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Liu, Li [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Chao [1 ]
Tan, Xuyun [3 ]
Gu, Zibei [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Learning, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Sociol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
corrupt behaviour; desire for wealth; economic inequality; official corruption crime; perceived fairness; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; INCOME INEQUALITY; CONSEQUENCES; REGRESSION; MOBILITY; WEALTH; REDISTRIBUTION; COINTEGRATION; WILLINGNESS; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1111/bjso.12610
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Economists and political scientists have long debated the relations between economic inequality and corruption at the societal level. Extending this literature, we proposed and tested that economic inequality breeds the corrupt behaviour of individuals. Analyses of 45-year archival data from the United States found that official corruption crimes were more prevalent in years and states with greater economic inequality. Three subsequent experiments (N = 776) using economic games showed that individuals exposed to greater economic inequality exhibited more corrupt behaviour in both Chinese and American cultures. Furthermore, the increased desire for wealth and the perception of reduced fairness accounted for this effect. These findings highlight that excessive economic inequality creates a competitive environment in which people give priority to themselves over others and suggest a vicious cycle between economic inequality and corruption.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 971
页数:23
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   An experimental bribery game [J].
Abbink, K ;
Irlenbusch, B ;
Renner, E .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2002, 18 (02) :428-454
[2]   The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation [J].
Ambrose, Maureen L. ;
Schminke, Marshall .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :491-500
[3]   Support for democracy in cross-national perspective: The detrimental effect of economic inequality [J].
Andersen, Robert .
RESEARCH IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND MOBILITY, 2012, 30 (04) :389-402
[4]   Turning a Blind Eye: Experimental Evidence of Partisan Bias in Attitudes Toward Corruption [J].
Anduiza, Eva ;
Gallego, Aina ;
Munoz, Jordi .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2013, 46 (12) :1664-1692
[5]  
Ata A.Y., 2011, International Journal of Business and Social Science, V2, P161
[6]   When income differences hurt or excite: The nonlinear effect of regional inequality on subjective wellbeing [J].
Becchetti, Leonardo ;
Colcerasa, Francesco ;
Pisani, Fabio .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2023, 69 (04) :1114-1135
[7]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[8]   Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data [J].
Bell, Andrew ;
Jones, Kelvyn .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2015, 3 (01) :133-153
[9]   Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence [J].
Berg, Andrew ;
Ostry, Jonathan D. ;
Tsangarides, Charalambos G. ;
Yakhshilikov, Yorbol .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2018, 23 (03) :259-305
[10]   Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? [J].
Bowles, S ;
Park, Y .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2005, 115 (507) :F397-F412