Comparison of Centralized and Multi-Layer Architectures for Nonlinear Model Predictive Torque-Vectoring and Traction Control

被引:1
作者
Rini, Gabriele [1 ]
De Bernardis, Martino [2 ]
Bottiglione, Francesco [3 ]
Hartavi, Ahu Ece [2 ]
Sorniotti, Aldo [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Bari, Dept Elect & Informat Engn, Via E Orabona 1, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Automot Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, England
[3] Politecn Bari, Dept Mech Math & Management, Via E Orabona 4, I-70125 Bari, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Direct yaw moment control; Torque-vectoring; Wheel dynamics; Wheel slip control; Nonlinear model predictive control; Centralized architecture; Multi-layer architecture; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; STABILITY CONTROL; STABILIZATION; YAW; LIMITS; MPC;
D O I
10.1007/s12239-023-0090-x
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A significant body of literature discusses direct yaw moment controllers for vehicle stability control and torque-vectoring (TV), based on model predictive control. However, the available references lack an analysis of the effect of including or excluding the wheel dynamics in the prediction model in combined longitudinal and lateral acceleration conditions, which is related to the control system architecture. In fact, in the first case, the controller can also fulfill the wheel slip control function, according to a centralized architecture, while in the second case, the tire slip limitation has to be implemented externally, in a multi-layer approach. This study addresses the identified gap by proposing and comparing-through simulations with a high-fidelity vehicle model-centralized and multilayer real-time implementable architectures using nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for the TV and traction control (TC) of an electric vehicle with front in-wheel motors. An optimization routine calibrates the main controller parameters, to ensure fairness in the comparison during extreme accelerating-while-cornering maneuvers with transient steering inputs. The results show that the real-time implementable multi-layer architecture with wheel dynamics in the NMPC prediction model, and considering the externally generated TC torque reduction in the TV layer, provides equivalent performance to a centralized set-up.
引用
收藏
页码:1101 / 1116
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Wheel Slip Control via Second-Order Sliding-Mode Generation [J].
Amodeo, Matteo ;
Ferrara, Antonella ;
Terzaghi, Riccardo ;
Vecchio, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 11 (01) :122-131
[2]  
Ariens D., 2010, Acado for matlab user's manual
[3]   Model Predictive Control for integrated lateral stability, traction/braking control, and rollover prevention of electric vehicles [J].
Ataei, Mansour ;
Khajepour, Amir ;
Jeon, Soo .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 58 (01) :49-73
[4]  
Bakker E., 1987, SAE TECHNICAL PAPER, V870421
[5]   LTV-MPC for Yaw Rate Control and Side Slip Control with Dynamically Constrained Differential Braking [J].
Barbarisi, Osvaldo ;
Palmieri, Giovanni ;
Scala, Stefano ;
Glielmo, Luigi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2009, 15 (3-4) :468-479
[6]  
Basrah M. S., 2016, 13 INT S ADV VEH CON
[7]   Wheel slip control with torque blending using linear and nonlinear model predictive control [J].
Basrah, M. Sofian ;
Siampis, Efstathios ;
Velenis, Efstathios ;
Cao, Dongpu ;
Longo, Stefano .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2017, 55 (11) :1665-1685
[8]   Model Predictive Control for Vehicle Stabilization at the Limits of Handling [J].
Beal, Craig Earl ;
Gerdes, J. Christian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 21 (04) :1258-1269
[9]  
Borrelli F., 2005, International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems, V3, P265, DOI 10.1504/IJVAS.2005.008237
[10]   Vehicle yaw control using a fast NMPC approach [J].
Canale, M. ;
Fagiano, L. .
47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, :5360-5365