Evolution of the information transmission between Chinese and international oil markets: A quantile-based framework

被引:35
作者
Duan, Kun [1 ]
Ren, Xiaohang [2 ]
Wen, Fenghua [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Jinyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Finance, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Information transmission; Shanghai oil market; WTI oil benchmark; Causality-in-quantiles test; Quantile-on-quantile method; PRICE SHOCKS; DEPENDENCE; INTEGRATION; REGIONALIZATION; CAUSALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100304
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the evolution of the information transmission between Chinese and international crude oil markets from the perspective of return and volatility spillovers through a quantile-based framework. Using a causality-in-quantiles test, we find the asymmetric and nonlinear transmission featured by uni-directional spillovers from international WTI to China's Shanghai oil markets in different conditions of the two markets, but not the other way around. Moreover, the degree of the information transmission is estimated using a Quantile-on-Quantile approach. Through this, marginal impacts of return and volatility of the WTI oil benchmark on that of the Shanghai oil market in a full-distributional environment are respectively gauged. We find that both return and volatility spillovers demonstrate an overall positive and heightening intensity with increases in the corresponding quantiles of the Shanghai oil market. The spillovers would be weakened by extreme events in the China domestic market, suggesting an important role of internal innovations in governing the Chinese and international oil market relationship. Overall, our results do not support the 'one great pool' hypothesis in the global oil market, and possess important implications. A battery of robustness checks reassures our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Information transmission between the Gulf equity markets of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain [J].
Abraham, Abraham ;
Seyyed, Fazal J. .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2006, 20 (03) :276-285
[42]   Research on the Integration of Price Between Chinese Refined Oil and International Refined Oil [J].
Wang Deyao ;
Cheng Guoping .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, :2124-2127
[43]   Dependence structure between the international crude oil market and the European markets of biodiesel and rapeseed oil [J].
Yahya, Muhammad ;
Dutta, Anupam ;
Bouri, Elie ;
Wadstrom, Christoffer ;
Uddin, Gazi Salah .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 197 :594-605
[44]   On the volatility transmission between oil and stock markets: a comparison of emerging importers and exporters [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Demirer, Riza .
ECONOMIA POLITICA, 2016, 33 (01) :63-82
[45]   Multi-scale risk contagion among international oil market, Chinese commodity market and Chinese stock market: A MODWT-Vine quantile regression approach [J].
Wen, Fenghua ;
Liu, Zhen ;
Dai, Zhifeng ;
He, Shaoyi ;
Liu, Wenhua .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 109
[46]   Return and volatility linkages between international energy markets and Chinese commodity market [J].
Sun, Guanglin ;
Li, Jianfeng ;
Shang, Zezhong .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 179
[47]   Volatility Transmission Between Oil and Stock Markets: A Extreme-BEKK-GARCH Model [J].
Huai, Jingliang .
COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2025,
[48]   Information transmission and entropy-based network between Chinese stock market and commodity futures market [J].
Niu, Hongli ;
Hu, Ziang .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 74
[49]   Dynamic risk spillovers from oil to stock markets: Fresh evidence from GARCH copula quantile regression-based CoVaR model [J].
Tian, Maoxi ;
Alshater, Muneer M. ;
Yoon, Seong-Min .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 115
[50]   How do great shocks influence the correlation between oil and international stock markets? [J].
Zhang, Bing .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (15) :1513-1526