Comparative analysis of sleeve conversions of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2020 Database

被引:5
作者
Clapp, Benjamin [1 ]
Cottam, Samuel [2 ]
Salame, Marita [3 ]
Marr, John D. [1 ]
Galvani, Carlos [4 ]
Ponce, Jaime [5 ]
English, Wayne J. [6 ]
Ghanem, Omar M. [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr El Paso, Dept Surg, El Paso, TX USA
[2] Bariatr Med Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Dept Surg, New Orleans, LA USA
[5] CHI Mem Med Grp, Dept Surg, Chattanooga, TN USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Endocrine & Metab Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Sleeve gastrectomy; Conversions; Revisions; Revisions of sleeve gastrectomy; Y GASTRIC BYPASS; MORBID-OBESITY; WEIGHT-LOSS; GASTRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2023.07.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the dominant bariatric procedure, studies have shown conversion rates of up to 30%. These conversions are generally for weight regain (WR), insufficient weight loss (IWL) or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Before 2020, details on why conversions were being performed were not collected in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use Data File (PUF). Now, the indication for sleeve conversion is noted in the PUF, allowing identification and reporting sleeve conversion reasons.Objective: We aimed to examine the reasons for SG conversions nationwide. Setting: The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF.Methods: The 2020 MBSAQIP PUF was examined to determine the reasons why SG were converted to other operations. The data field of "Revision/Conversion Final Indication" was used along with "Procedure type." Primary bariatric operations were excluded. Descriptive statistics were applied. Different reasons for conversion and operations were compared by preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes.Results: There were 103,782 primary SG reported in the 2020 PUF. There were 7181 SG that were converted to other operations. The most common conversion (86.2%) was to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The main reason for SG conversion was GERD at 48.4%, followed by WR/IWL (41.9%). Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve patients differed significantly from RYGB patients in specific preoperative characteristics and operative outcomes.Conclusion: The most common procedure SG is converted to is the RYGB. GERD was the most common reason for SG conversion, followed by WR/IWL. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024;20:47-52.)(c) 2024 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), 2019, ASMBS endorsed procedures and FDA approved devices
  • [2] [Anonymous], MBSAQIP Operations Manual
  • [3] The Outcomes of Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch on Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: the Mayo Clinic Experience
    Badaoui, Joseph N.
    Kellogg, Todd A.
    Abu Dayyeh, Barham K.
    Maroun, Justin W.
    McKenzie, Travis J.
    Harmsen, William S.
    Kendrick, Michael L.
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (10) : 4363 - 4370
  • [4] Beyond 5 years: a matched cohort of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass
    Blevins, Katherine S.
    Garcia, Luis
    Forrester, Joseph D.
    Morton, John M.
    Azagury, Dan E.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2022, 18 (06) : 789 - 793
  • [5] American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Ponce, Jaime
    DeMaria, Eric
    Ghanem, Omar
    Hutter, Matthew
    Kothari, Shanu
    LaMasters, Teresa
    Kurian, Marina
    English, Wayne
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2022, 18 (09) : 1134 - 1140
  • [6] Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Wynn, Matthew
    Martyn, Colin
    Foster, Chase
    O'Dell, Montana
    Tyroch, Alan
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (06) : 741 - 747
  • [7] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With Preexisting Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease A National Analysis
    DuPree, Cecily E.
    Blair, Kelly
    Steele, Scott R.
    Martin, Matthew J.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (04) : 328 - 334
  • [8] Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database
    El Chaar, Maher
    Lundberg, Peter
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (05) : 545 - 551
  • [9] Fifteen Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Loss, Remission of Associated Medical Problems, Quality of Life, and Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-Long-Term Follow-Up in a Multicenter Study
    Felsenreich, Daniel M.
    Artemiou, Evi
    Steinlechner, Katharina
    Vock, Natalie
    Jedamzik, Julia
    Eichelter, Jakob
    Gensthaler, Lisa
    Bichler, Christoph
    Sperker, Christoph
    Beckerhinn, Philipp
    Kristo, Ivan
    Langer, Felix B.
    Prager, Gerhard
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (08) : 3453 - 3461
  • [10] Treatment Options for Weight Regain or Insufficient Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Franken, Rutger J.
    Sluiter, Nina R.
    Franken, Josephine
    de Vries, Ralph
    Souverein, Dennis
    Gerdes, Vitor E. A.
    de Brauw, Maurits
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (06) : 2035 - 2046