Brain Network Analysis: A Review on Multivariate Analytical Methods

被引:6
作者
Bahrami, Mohsen [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Laurienti, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Shappell, Heather M. [1 ,3 ]
Simpson, Sean L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Lab Complex Brain Networks, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
brain networks; connectivity; data-driven; model-based; multivariate; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; MODELING FRAMEWORK; FMRI DATA; SUBJECT; CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; COMPLEXITY; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.1089/brain.2022.0007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Despite the explosive growth of neuroimaging studies aimed at analyzing the brain as a complex system, critical methodological gaps remain to be addressed. Most tools currently used for analyzing network data of the brain are univariate in nature and are based on assumptions borne out of previous techniques not directly related to the big and complex data of the brain. Although graph-based methods have shown great promise, the development of principled multivariate models to address inherent limitations of graph-based methods, such as their dependence on network size and degree distributions, and to allow assessing the effects of multiple phenotypes on the brain and simulating brain networks has largely lagged behind. Although some studies have been made in developing multivariate frameworks to fill this gap, in the absence of a "gold-standard" method or guidelines, choosing the most appropriate method for each study can be another critical challenge for investigators in this multidisciplinary field. Here, we briefly introduce important multivariate methods for brain network analyses in two main categories: data-driven and model-based methods. We discuss whether/how such methods are suited for examining connectivity (edge-level), topology (system-level), or both. This review will aid in choosing an appropriate multivariate method with respect to variables such as network type, number of subjects and brain regions included, and the interest in connectivity, topology, or both. This review is aimed to be accessible to investigators from different backgrounds, with a focus on applications in brain network studies, though the methods may be applicable in other areas too. Impact statementAs the U.S. National Institute of Health notes, the rich biomedical data can greatly improve our knowledge of human health if new analytical tools are developed, and their applications are broadly disseminated. A major challenge in analyzing the brain as a complex system is about developing parsimonious multivariate methods, and particularly choosing the most appropriate one among the existing methods with respect to the study variables in this multidisciplinary field. This study provides a review on the most important multivariate methods to aid in helping the most appropriate ones with respect to the desired variables for each study.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 79
页数:16
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Fractal connectivity of long-memory networks [J].
Achard, Sophie ;
Bassett, Danielle S. ;
Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas ;
Bullmore, Edward T. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2008, 77 (03)
[2]   Group-fused multivariate regression modeling for group-level brain networks [J].
Aggarwal, Priya ;
Gupta, Anubha .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2019, 363 :140-148
[3]   Multivariate brain network graph identification in functional MRI [J].
Aggarwal, Priya ;
Gupta, Anubha ;
Garg, Ajay .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2017, 42 :228-240
[4]   The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes [J].
Amico, Enrico ;
Goni, Joaquin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
[5]   A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance [J].
Anderson, MJ .
AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 26 (01) :32-46
[6]   Altered default mode network associated with pesticide exposure in Latinx children from rural farmworker families [J].
Bahrami, Mohsen ;
Simpson, Sean L. ;
Burdette, Jonathan H. ;
Lyday, Robert G. ;
Quandt, Sara A. ;
Chen, Haiying ;
Arcury, Thomas A. ;
Laurienti, Paul J. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 256
[7]   Analysis of brain subnetworks within the context of their whole-brain networks [J].
Bahrami, Mohsen ;
Laurienti, Paul J. ;
Simpson, Sean L. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2019, 40 (17) :5123-5141
[8]   A MATLAB toolbox for multivariate analysis of brain networks [J].
Bahrami, Mohsen ;
Laurienti, Paul J. ;
Simpson, Sean L. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2019, 40 (01) :175-186
[9]   ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVE SELF-DIFFUSION TENSOR FROM THE NMR SPIN-ECHO [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 103 (03) :247-254
[10]   Understanding complexity in the human brain [J].
Bassett, Danielle S. ;
Gazzaniga, Michael S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) :200-209