Development, reliability, and validity of a self-assessment scale for dementia care management

被引:1
|
作者
Kazawa, Kana [1 ,3 ]
Mochizuki, Mariko [2 ]
Ochikubo, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Ishii, Shinya [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Integrated Approach Social Inclus, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Care Manager Assoc, Hiroshima, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Med Integrated Approach Social Inclus, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami Ku, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
关键词
dementia; long-term care; self-assessment; validation study;
D O I
10.1111/psyg.12937
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study aimed to develop a self-assessment scale for care management of people with dementia and examine its reliability and validity. MethodsBased on Bloom's Taxonomy, previous research, and experts' opinions on dementia and care management, a scale consisting of 18 items was developed to assess care managers' attitudes, knowledge, and skills in their management of people with dementia. To examine the scale's reliability and validity, data were collected from 638 care managers. Construct validity using exploratory factor analysis, known-group validity, and internal consistency reliability of the scale were evaluated. ResultsExploratory factor analysis supported the construct validity with a four-factor model and explained 59.1% of the total variance. Following were the four factors: Factor I 'Person centred care'; Factor II 'Understanding of disease characteristics, treatment and care'; Factor III 'Understanding of people with dementia and care management according to their characteristics'; and Factor IV 'Utilization of local resources surrounding people with dementia'. Regarding the known-group validity, results showed that the group with a qualified chief care manager scored significantly higher than the group without one on Factors I (P = 0.013) and III (P = 0.026). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 18 items was 0.928. ConclusionsThe findings prove that the scale has acceptable reliability and validity, and can help care managers reflect on their practice. Future research is desirable to measure the validation of change in the scale.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 353
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability
    Power, Jason Richard
    Tanner, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (04) : 615 - 628
  • [42] The Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire for self-assessment of basic symptoms in the early detection of psychosisFactor structure, reliability, and predictive validity
    Uttinger, Martina
    Studerus, Erich
    Ittig, Sarah
    Heitz, Ulrike
    Schultze-Lutter, Frauke
    Riecher-Rossler, Anita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (02)
  • [43] A Smartphone-Based Timed Up and Go Test Self-Assessment for Older Adults: Validity and Reliability Study
    Boettinger, Melissa Johanna
    Mellone, Sabato
    Klenk, Jochen
    Jansen, Carl-Philipp
    Stefanakis, Marios
    Litz, Elena
    Bredenbrock, Anastasia
    Fischer, Jan-Philipp
    Bauer, Juergen M.
    Becker, Clemens
    Gordt-Oesterwind, Katharina
    JMIR AGING, 2025, 8
  • [44] Care Staff's Daily Living Decision-Making Support Scale for Older Adults with Dementia in Japan: Development of Validity and Reliability
    Suzuki, Mizue
    Kanamori, Takuya
    Koide, Yukio
    Asai, Yatami
    Sato, Masako
    Naito, Tomoyoshi
    Inagaki, Keigo
    Kanamori, Masao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (20)
  • [45] The reliability, validity, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the Chinese version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale
    Chen, Chia-Wei
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Chia-Fen
    Yang, Hui-Ling
    Tsai, Jui-Chen
    Chung, Min-Huey
    Liao, Yuan-Mei
    Chi, Mei-ju
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2015, 24 (21-22) : 3118 - 3128
  • [46] The Computer Book of the Internal Medicine resident: validity and reliability of a questionnaire for self-assessment of competences in internal medicine residents
    Oristrell, J.
    Casanovas, A.
    Jordana, R.
    Comet, R.
    Gil, M.
    Oliva, J. C.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2012, 212 (11): : 520 - 537
  • [47] Innovation in Self-Assessment of Quality Management Practices
    Abu Bakar, Nooh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2014, : 1574 - 1578
  • [48] Validity of an unsupervised self-administered questionnaire for self-assessment of melanoma risk
    Harbauer, A
    Binder, M
    Pehamberger, H
    Wolff, K
    Kittler, H
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2003, 13 (05) : 537 - 542
  • [49] The EFQM self-assessment model in performance management
    Schreurs, Jeanne
    Moreau, Rachel
    ECEC '2006: 13TH EUROPEAN CONCURRENT ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2006, : 99 - +
  • [50] Self-Efficacy in Nursing Competencies during Students' Clinical Practicum: The Development of a Self-Assessment Scale
    Arribas-Marin, Juan
    Plumed-Moreno, Calixto
    Hernandez-Franco, Vicente
    NURSING REPORTS, 2024, 14 (03) : 2327 - 2339