Deep-learning-reconstructed high-resolution 3D cervical spine MRI for foraminal stenosis evaluation

被引:19
作者
Jardon, Meghan [1 ]
Tan, Ek T. [1 ]
Chazen, J. Levi [1 ]
Sahr, Meghan [1 ]
Wen, Yan [2 ]
Schneider, Brandon [3 ]
Sneag, Darryl B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Radiol & Imaging, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Res Adm, Biostat Core, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Deep-learning-based reconstruction; 3D MRI; Cervical spine; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s00256-022-04211-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare standard-of-care two-dimensional MRI acquisitions of the cervical spine with those from a single three-dimensional MRI acquisition, reconstructed using a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. We hypothesized that the improved image quality provided by deep-learning-based reconstruction would result in improved inter-rater agreement for cervical spine foraminal stenosis compared to conventional two-dimensional acquisitions. Materials and methods Forty-one patients underwent routine cervical spine MRI with a conventional protocol comprising two-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scans (2 axial planes, 1 sagittal plane), and an isotropic-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scan reconstructed over a 4-h time window with a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. Three radiologists retrospectively assessed images for the degree to which motion artifact limited clinical assessment, and foraminal and central stenosis at each level. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed with weighted Fleiss's kappa (k) and comparisons between two-dimensional and three-dimensional sequences were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Inter-rater agreement for foraminal stenosis was "substantial" for two-dimensional sequences (k = 0.76) and "excellent" for the three-dimensional sequence (k = 0.81). Agreement was "excellent" for both sequences (k = 0.85 and 0.83) for central stenosis. The three-dimensional sequence had less perceptible motion artifact (p <= 0.001-0.036). Mean total scan time was 10.8 min for the two-dimensional sequences, and 7.3 min for the three-dimensional sequence. Conclusion Three-dimensional MRI reconstructed with a deep-learning-based algorithm provided "excellent" inter-observer agreement for foraminal and central stenosis, which was at least equivalent to standard-of-care two-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional MRI with deep-learning-based reconstruction was less prone to motion artifact, with overall scan time savings.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 732
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Diagnostic Accuracy of Zero-Echo Time MRI for the Evaluation of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis [J].
Argentieri, Erin C. ;
Koff, Matthew F. ;
Breighner, Ryan E. ;
Endo, Yoshimi ;
Shah, Parina H. ;
Sneag, Darryl B. .
SPINE, 2018, 43 (13) :928-933
[2]   Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE [J].
Barnaure, I ;
Galley, J. ;
Fritz, B. ;
Sutter, R. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (07) :1453-1462
[3]   Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data-driven parallel imaging methods [J].
Brau, Anja C. S. ;
Beatty, Philip J. ;
Skare, Stefan ;
Bammer, Roland .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 59 (02) :382-395
[4]   Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo [J].
Busse, Reed F. ;
Brau, Anja C. S. ;
Vu, Anthony ;
Michelich, Charles R. ;
Bayram, Ersin ;
Kijowski, Richard ;
Reeder, Scott B. ;
Rowley, Howard A. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (03) :640-649
[5]   Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains:: Design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast [J].
Busse, RF ;
Hariharan, H ;
Vu, A ;
Brittain, JH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (05) :1030-1037
[6]   Diagnostic Quality of 3D T2-SPACE Compared with T2-FSE in the Evaluation of Cervicit Spine MRI Anatomy [J].
Chokshi, F. H. ;
Sadigh, G. ;
Carpenter, W. ;
Allen, J. W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2017, 38 (04) :846-850
[7]  
DANIELS DL, 1986, AM J NEURORADIOL, V7, P129
[8]   Three-Dimensional Isotropic MRI of the Cervical Spine A Diagnostic Comparison With Conventional MRI [J].
Fu, Michael C. ;
Buerba, Rafael A. ;
Neway, William E., III ;
Brown, James E. ;
Trivedi, Mitesh ;
Lischuk, Andrew W. ;
Haims, Andrew H. ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. .
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (02) :66-71
[9]   Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data [J].
Hammernik, Kerstin ;
Klatzer, Teresa ;
Kobler, Erich ;
Recht, Michael P. ;
Sodickson, Daniel K. ;
Pock, Thomas ;
Knoll, Florian .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (06) :3055-3071
[10]   Feasibility and Implementation of a Deep Learning MR Reconstruction for TSE Sequences in Musculoskeletal Imaging [J].
Herrmann, Judith ;
Koerzdoerfer, Gregor ;
Nickel, Dominik ;
Mostapha, Mahmoud ;
Nadar, Mariappan ;
Gassenmaier, Sebastian ;
Kuestner, Thomas ;
Othman, Ahmed E. .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (08)