Monitoring and apportioning sources of indoor air quality using low-cost particulate matter sensors

被引:35
作者
Bousiotis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Alconcel, Leah-Nani S. [2 ]
Beddows, David C. S. [1 ]
Harrison, Roy M. [1 ,3 ]
Pope, Francis D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Div Environm Hlth & Risk Management, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Met & Mat, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Ctr Excellence Environm Studies, Dept Environm Sci, POB 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Particulate matter; Source apportionment; Indoor air quality; Exposure; Infiltration; PM2; 5; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; INDOOR/OUTDOOR RELATIONSHIPS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; BACKGROUND SITE; POLLUTION; URBAN; PARTICLES; PM2.5; HOMES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2023.107907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Air quality is one of the most important factors in public health. While outdoor air quality is widely studied, the indoor environment has been less scrutinised, even though time spent indoors is typically much greater than outdoors. The emergence of low-cost sensors can help assess indoor air quality. This study provides a new methodology, utilizing low-cost sensors and source apportionment techniques, to understand the relative importance of indoor and outdoor air pollution sources upon indoor air quality. The methodology is tested with three sensors placed in different rooms inside an exemplar house (bedroom, kitchen and office) and one out-doors. When the family was present, the bedroom had the highest average concentrations for PM2.5 and PM10 (3.9 +/- 6.8 ug/m3 and 9.6 +/- 12.7 mu g/m3 respectively), due to the activities undertaken there and the presence of softer furniture and carpeting. The kitchen, while presenting the lowest PM concentrations for both size ranges (2.8 +/- 5.9 ug/m3 and 4.2 +/- 6.9 mu g/m3 respectively), presented the highest PM spikes, especially during cooking times. Increased ventilation in the office resulted in the highest PM1 concentration (1.6 +/- 1.9 mu g/m3), high-lighting the strong effect of infiltration of outdoor air for the smallest particles. Source apportionment, via positive matrix factorisation (PMF), showed that up to 95 % of the PM1 was found to be of outdoor sources in all the rooms. This effect was reduced as particle size increased, with outdoor sources contributing >65 % of the PM2.5, and up to 50 % of the PM10, depending on the room studied. The new approach to elucidate the con-tributions of different sources to total indoor air pollution exposure, described in this paper, is easily scalable and translatable to different indoor locations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Monitoring Residential Wood Burning [J].
Hassani, Amirhossein ;
Schneider, Philipp ;
Vogt, Matthias ;
Castell, Nuria .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (40) :15162-15172
[32]   Calibration of PurpleAir low-cost particulate matter sensors: model development for air quality under high relative humidity conditions [J].
Mathieu-Campbell, Martine E. ;
Guo, Chuqi ;
Grieshop, Andrew P. ;
Richmond-Bryant, Jennifer .
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (22) :6735-6749
[33]   Utilizing Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Indoor Air Quality in Mongolian Gers [J].
Flowerday, Callum E. ;
Lundrigan, Philip ;
Kitras, Christopher ;
Nguyen, Tu ;
Hansen, Jaron C. .
SENSORS, 2023, 23 (18)
[34]   Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution [J].
Bulot, Florentin Michel Jacques ;
Russell, Hugo Savill ;
Rezaei, Mohsen ;
Johnson, Matthew Stanley ;
Ossont, Steven James Johnston ;
Morris, Andrew Kevin Richard ;
Basford, Philip James ;
Easton, Natasha Hazel Celeste ;
Foster, Gavin Lee ;
Loxham, Matthew ;
Cox, Simon James .
SENSORS, 2020, 20 (08)
[35]   Monitoring Indoor Air Quality in Classrooms Using Low-Cost Sensors: Does the Perception of Teachers Match Reality? [J].
Canha, Nuno ;
Correia, Carolina ;
Mendez, Sergio ;
Gamelas, Carla A. ;
Felizardo, Miguel .
ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (12)
[36]   Examining the functional range of commercially available low-cost airborne particle sensors and consequences for monitoring of indoor air quality in residences [J].
Zou, Yangyang ;
Young, Matthew ;
Chen, Jiawei ;
Liu, Jiaqi ;
May, Andrew ;
Clark, Jordan D. .
INDOOR AIR, 2020, 30 (02) :213-234
[37]   Towards comprehensive air quality management using low-cost sensors for pollution source apportionment [J].
Bousiotis, Dimitrios ;
Allison, Gordon ;
Beddows, David C. S. ;
Harrison, Roy M. ;
Pope, Francis D. .
NPJ CLIMATE AND ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE, 2023, 6 (01)
[38]   Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season [J].
He, Jiayang ;
Huang, Ching-Hsuan ;
Yuan, Nanhsun ;
Austin, Elena ;
Seto, Edmund ;
Novosselov, Igor .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 285
[39]   Development of low-cost indoor air quality monitoring devices: Recent advancements [J].
Chojer, H. ;
Branco, P. T. B. S. ;
Martins, F. G. ;
Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M. ;
Sousa, S. I., V .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 727
[40]   Indoor air quality assessment of particulate matter levels in urban homes in India [J].
Vijay, Prince ;
Sahota, Vinayak ;
Singh, Rajdeep ;
Dubey, Shreya ;
Borse, Sonali ;
Phuleria, Harish C. .
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2025, 16 (08)