Effectiveness of artificial intelligence screening in preventing vision loss from diabetes: a policy model

被引:12
作者
Channa, Roomasa [1 ]
Wolf, Risa M. [2 ]
Abramoff, Michael D. [3 ]
Lehmann, Harold P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Sect Biomed Informat & Data Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR THERAPY; REAL-WORLD OUTCOMES; MACULAR EDEMA; RETINOPATHY; POPULATION; PHOTOCOAGULATION; TELEMEDICINE; GUIDELINES; ADHERENCE; BLINDNESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-023-00785-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to perform diabetic retinal exams ('screening') on preventing vision loss is not known. We designed the Care Process for Preventing Vision Loss from Diabetes (CAREVL), as a Markov model to compare the effectiveness of point-of-care autonomous AI-based screening with in-office clinical exam by an eye care provider (ECP), on preventing vision loss among patients with diabetes. The estimated incidence of vision loss at 5 years was 1535 per 100,000 in the AI-screened group compared to 1625 per 100,000 in the ECP group, leading to a modelled risk difference of 90 per 100,000. The base-case CAREVL model estimated that an autonomous AI-based screening strategy would result in 27,000 fewer Americans with vision loss at 5 years compared with ECP. Vision loss at 5 years remained lower in the AI-screened group compared to the ECP group, in a wide range of parameters including optimistic estimates biased toward ECP. Real-world modifiable factors associated with processes of care could further increase its effectiveness. Of these factors, increased adherence with treatment was estimated to have the greatest impact.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [21] State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018
    Foster, Nicole C.
    Beck, Roy W.
    Miller, Kellee M.
    Clements, Mark A.
    Rickels, Michael R.
    DiMeglio, Linda A.
    Maahs, David M.
    Tamborlane, William V.
    Bergenstal, Richard
    Smith, Elizabeth
    Olson, Beth A.
    Garg, Satish K.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 (02) : 66 - 72
  • [22] Five-Year Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Primary Care-Based, Nonmydriatic Automated Retinal Image Analysis Screening Among Low-Income Patients With Diabetes
    Fuller, Spencer D.
    Hu, Jenny
    Liu, James C.
    Gibson, Ella
    Gregory, Martin
    Kuo, Jessica
    Rajagopal, Rithwick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (02): : 415 - 427
  • [23] Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
    Gulshan, Varun
    Peng, Lily
    Coram, Marc
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    Wu, Derek
    Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam
    Venugopalan, Subhashini
    Widner, Kasumi
    Madams, Tom
    Cuadros, Jorge
    Kim, Ramasamy
    Raman, Rajiv
    Nelson, Philip C.
    Mega, Jessica L.
    Webster, R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2402 - 2410
  • [24] Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? The testing of healthcare interventions is evolving
    Haynes, B
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7211) : 652 - 653
  • [25] The impact of a better-seeing eye and a worse-seeing eye on vision-related quality of life
    Hirneiss, Christoph
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 1703 - 1709
  • [26] Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
    Husereau, Don
    Drummond, Michael
    Augustovski, Federico
    De Bekker-Grob, Esther
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Carswell, Chris
    Caulley, Lisa
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Greenberg, Dan
    Loder, Elizabeth
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Petrou, Stavros
    Pwu, Raoh-Fang
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [27] Pivotal Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Autonomous Detection of Referrable and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy
    Ipp, Eli
    Liljenquist, David
    Bode, Bruce
    Shah, Viral N.
    Silverstein, Steven
    Regillo, Carl D.
    Lim, Jennifer, I
    Sadda, SriniVas
    Domalpally, Amitha
    Gray, Gerry
    Bhaskaranand, Malavika
    Ramachandra, Chaithanya
    Solanki, Kaushal
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (11) : E2134254
  • [28] Evaluation of Diabetic Retinal Screening and Factors for Ophthalmology Referral in a Telemedicine Network
    Jani, Pooja D.
    Forbes, Lauren
    Choudhury, Arkopal
    Preisser, John S.
    Viera, Anthony J.
    Garg, Seema
    [J]. JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 135 (07) : 706 - 714
  • [29] Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study
    Kim, Hyo-Eun
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Kim, Ki Hwan
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Nam, Hyeonseob
    Lee, Eun Hye
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    [J]. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 2 (03): : E138 - E148
  • [30] Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials
    Kwan, Janice L.
    Lo, Lisha
    Ferguson, Jacob
    Goldberg, Hanna
    Diaz-Martinez, Juan Pablo
    Tomlinson, George
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Shojania, Kaveh G.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370