Effectiveness of artificial intelligence screening in preventing vision loss from diabetes: a policy model

被引:12
作者
Channa, Roomasa [1 ]
Wolf, Risa M. [2 ]
Abramoff, Michael D. [3 ]
Lehmann, Harold P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Sect Biomed Informat & Data Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR THERAPY; REAL-WORLD OUTCOMES; MACULAR EDEMA; RETINOPATHY; POPULATION; PHOTOCOAGULATION; TELEMEDICINE; GUIDELINES; ADHERENCE; BLINDNESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-023-00785-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The effectiveness of using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to perform diabetic retinal exams ('screening') on preventing vision loss is not known. We designed the Care Process for Preventing Vision Loss from Diabetes (CAREVL), as a Markov model to compare the effectiveness of point-of-care autonomous AI-based screening with in-office clinical exam by an eye care provider (ECP), on preventing vision loss among patients with diabetes. The estimated incidence of vision loss at 5 years was 1535 per 100,000 in the AI-screened group compared to 1625 per 100,000 in the ECP group, leading to a modelled risk difference of 90 per 100,000. The base-case CAREVL model estimated that an autonomous AI-based screening strategy would result in 27,000 fewer Americans with vision loss at 5 years compared with ECP. Vision loss at 5 years remained lower in the AI-screened group compared to the ECP group, in a wide range of parameters including optimistic estimates biased toward ECP. Real-world modifiable factors associated with processes of care could further increase its effectiveness. Of these factors, increased adherence with treatment was estimated to have the greatest impact.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Foundational Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Using Ophthalmic Images
    Abramoff, Michael D.
    Cunningham, Brad
    Patel, Bakul
    Eydelman, Malvina B.
    Leng, Theodore
    Sakamoto, Taiji
    Blodi, Barbara
    Grenon, S. Marlene
    Wolf, Risa M.
    Manrai, Arjun K.
    Ko, Justin M.
    Chiang, Michael F.
    Char, Danton
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 129 (02) : E14 - E32
  • [2] Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices
    Abramoff, Michael D.
    Lavin, Philip T.
    Birch, Michele
    Shah, Nilay
    Folk, James C.
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 1
  • [4] American Diabetes Association, Statistics about Diabetes
  • [5] Adherence to the American Diabetes Association retinal screening guidelines for population with diabetes in the United States
    An, JaeJin
    Niu, Fang
    Turpcu, Adam
    Rajput, Yamina
    Cheetham, T. Craig
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1981, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V88, P583
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1985, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V103, P1644
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, TYPE 2 DIABETES
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2016, Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. A practical guide to conducting research and assessment
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2022, YOUR BLIND HAV LOW V