Evaluation of the trueness and precision of conventional impressions versus digital scans for the all-on-four treatment in the maxillary arch: An in vitro study

被引:2
|
作者
Nour, Nour Jamal Marshaha [1 ]
Azhari, Amr Ahmed [2 ]
Assery, Mansour K. [3 ]
Ahmed, Walaa Magdy [2 ]
机构
[1] Riyadh Elm Univ, Fac Dent, Grad Prosthodont, Prosthodont, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Jeddah 23233, Saudi Arabia
[3] Riyadh Elm Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2024年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
accuracy; all-on-four; conventional impression; digital scan; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; DATA-ACQUISITION; ACCURACY; TECHNOLOGY; JAW;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13666
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeTo compare the accuracy of digitizing conventional impressions to intraoral surface scans for all-on-four treatment in the maxillary arch. Materials and methodsAn edentulous maxillary arch model with four implants placed in an all-on-four design was fabricated. Intraoral surface scans (n = 10) were obtained using an intraoral scanner after scan body insertion. For conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions of the model, implant copings were inserted into the implant fixation for implant level, opened tray impressions (n = 10). The model and conventional impressions were digitized to obtain digital files. A reference file was created using a laboratory-scanned conventional standard tessellation language (STL) file with analog to scan the body using exocad software. STL datasets from the two digital and conventional impression groups were superimposed with reference files to assess the 3D deviations. Two-way ANOVA and paired-samples t-test was performed to assess the difference in trueness and examine the effects of impression technique and implant angulation on the deviation amount. ResultsNo significant differences were found between the conventional impression and intraoral surface scan groups F(1, 76) = 2.705, p = 0.104. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and digital straight implants and between conventional and digital tilted implants F(1, 76) = .041, p = 0.841. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and conventional tilted implants p = 0.07 and between digital straight and digital tilted implants p = 0.08. ConclusionDigital scans were more accurate than conventional impressions. The digital straight implants were more accurate than the conventional straight implants, and the digital tilted implants were more accurate than the conventional tilted implants, with higher accuracy for digital straight implants.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 179
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [11] To evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts using various splinting methods on implant level impressions in All-on-Four treatment: An in vitro study
    Shankar, S. Daya
    Doddamani, Santosh
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (02): : 193 - 201
  • [12] In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings
    Conejo, Julian
    Yoo, Thomas H.
    Atria, Pablo J.
    Fraiman, Howard
    Blatz, Markus B.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (03): : 475e1 - 475e7
  • [13] Trueness and Precision Achieved With Conventional and Digital Implant Impressions: A Comparative Investigation of Stone Versus 3-D Printed Master Casts
    Mathey, Ayse
    Bragger, Urs
    Joda, Tim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 29 (03): : 152 - 159
  • [14] Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study
    Ke, Yifang
    Zhang, Yaopeng
    Wang, Yong
    Chen, Hu
    Sun, Yuchun
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 135
  • [15] In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions
    Ender, Andreas
    Mehl, Albert
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (01): : 9 - 17
  • [16] Effects of the intraoral scanner and implant library on the trueness of digital impressions in the full-arch implant scan: A comparative in vitro study
    Hauschild, Uli
    Lerner, Henriette
    Weigl, Paul
    Porra, Tommaso
    Admakin, Oleg
    Mangano, Francesco Guido
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 150
  • [17] Feasibility of Using a Prosthetic-Based Impression Template to Improve the Trueness and Precision of a Complete Arch Digital Impression on Four and Six Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Tallarico, Marco
    Lumbau, Aurea Immacolata
    Scrascia, Roberto
    Demelas, Gianluca
    Sanseverino, Franco
    Amarena, Rocco
    Meloni, Silvio Mario
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (16)
  • [18] Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
    Drancourt, Noemie
    Auduc, Chantal
    Mouget, Aymeric
    Mouminoux, Jean
    Auroy, Pascal
    Veyrune, Jean-Luc
    El Osta, Nada
    Nicolas, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [19] Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Romeo, Davide
    Chen, Yo-wei
    Natto, Zuhair
    Ercoli, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (04): : 281 - 286
  • [20] Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Palamara, Joseph E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)