Evaluation of the trueness and precision of conventional impressions versus digital scans for the all-on-four treatment in the maxillary arch: An in vitro study

被引:2
|
作者
Nour, Nour Jamal Marshaha [1 ]
Azhari, Amr Ahmed [2 ]
Assery, Mansour K. [3 ]
Ahmed, Walaa Magdy [2 ]
机构
[1] Riyadh Elm Univ, Fac Dent, Grad Prosthodont, Prosthodont, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Jeddah 23233, Saudi Arabia
[3] Riyadh Elm Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2024年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
accuracy; all-on-four; conventional impression; digital scan; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; DATA-ACQUISITION; ACCURACY; TECHNOLOGY; JAW;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13666
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeTo compare the accuracy of digitizing conventional impressions to intraoral surface scans for all-on-four treatment in the maxillary arch. Materials and methodsAn edentulous maxillary arch model with four implants placed in an all-on-four design was fabricated. Intraoral surface scans (n = 10) were obtained using an intraoral scanner after scan body insertion. For conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions of the model, implant copings were inserted into the implant fixation for implant level, opened tray impressions (n = 10). The model and conventional impressions were digitized to obtain digital files. A reference file was created using a laboratory-scanned conventional standard tessellation language (STL) file with analog to scan the body using exocad software. STL datasets from the two digital and conventional impression groups were superimposed with reference files to assess the 3D deviations. Two-way ANOVA and paired-samples t-test was performed to assess the difference in trueness and examine the effects of impression technique and implant angulation on the deviation amount. ResultsNo significant differences were found between the conventional impression and intraoral surface scan groups F(1, 76) = 2.705, p = 0.104. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and digital straight implants and between conventional and digital tilted implants F(1, 76) = .041, p = 0.841. No significant differences were found between conventional straight and conventional tilted implants p = 0.07 and between digital straight and digital tilted implants p = 0.08. ConclusionDigital scans were more accurate than conventional impressions. The digital straight implants were more accurate than the conventional straight implants, and the digital tilted implants were more accurate than the conventional tilted implants, with higher accuracy for digital straight implants.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 179
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for "All-on-Four" Restorations
    Gherlone, Enrico
    Cappare, Paolo
    Vinci, Raffale
    Ferrini, Francesco
    Gastaldi, Giorgio
    Crespi, Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (02) : 324 - 330
  • [2] Trueness of Extraoral Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant Impressions-In Vitro Study
    Sampaio-Fernandes, Manuel Antonio
    Pinto, Ricardo
    Almeida, Paulo Rocha
    Sampaio-Fernandes, Maria Margarida
    Marques, Duarte
    Figueiral, Maria Helena
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [3] Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions
    Jelicich, Alexander
    Scialabba, Rebecca
    Lee, Sang J.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (02): : 293 - 300
  • [4] Influence of scanbody design and intraoral scanner on the trueness of complete arch implant digital impressions: An in vitro study
    Meneghetti, Priscila Ceolin
    Li, Junying
    Borella, Paulo Sergio
    Mendonca, Gustavo
    Burnett Jr, Luiz Henrique
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [5] Effect of different surface locking patterns on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study
    Kondakji, Elissa
    Lawand, Ghida
    Yaacoub, Wassim
    Tohme, Hani
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (03): : 601e1 - 601e9
  • [6] The effect of operator scanning speed on the trueness and precision of full-arch digital impressions captured in vitro using an intraoral scanner
    Al-Ibrahim, I. K.
    Keeling, A. J.
    Osnes, C. A.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2021, 13 (04) : S265 - S270
  • [7] Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Cappare, Paolo
    Sannino, Gianpaolo
    Minoli, Margherita
    Montemezzi, Pietro
    Ferrini, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [8] Evaluation of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of a maxillary trial denture according to the layer thickness: An in vitro study
    You, Seung-Min
    You, Seung-Gyu
    Kang, Seen-Young
    Bae, So-Yeon
    Kim, Ji-Hwan
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 125 (01): : 139 - 145
  • [9] Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner
    Mennito, Anthony S.
    Evans, Zachary P.
    Nash, Jansen
    Bocklet, Christopher
    Lauer , Abigail
    Bacro, Thierry
    Cayouette, Monica
    Ludlow, Mark
    Renne, Walter G.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 31 (04) : 369 - 377
  • [10] Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study
    El Osta, Nada
    Drancourt, Noemie
    Auduc, Chantal
    Veyrune, Jean-Luc
    Nicolas, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 143