Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM)

被引:12
作者
Ballard, Lisa Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Band, Rebecca [4 ]
Lucassen, Anneke M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Southampton Gen Hosp, Clin Ethics Law & Soc CELS, Primary Care Populat Sci & Med Educ, South Acad Block,Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, NIHR Southampton Biomed Res Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Hlth Sci, Highfield Campus,Univ Rd, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Trust Ctr Human Genet, Clin Ethics Law & Soc CELS, Oxford OX3 7BN, Oxon, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; LYNCH SYNDROME; CANCER-PATIENTS; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; INDIVIDUALS; COUNSELEES; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Whilst the finding of heritable susceptibility to disease was once relatively rare, mainstreaming of genetic testing has resulted in a steady increase. Patients are often encouraged to share their genetic test results with relevant relatives, but relatives may not receive this information, leaving them without knowledge of their own risk. Therefore, strategies to help communicate such information are important. This review aimed to explore the efficacy of existing interventions to improve the sharing of genetic test results. A synthesis without meta-analysis design was used. A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and AMED was conducted, and five studies were identified worldwide. Data were extracted for each study regarding study aim, participant characteristics, condition, intervention details, comparison, study duration, outcome measures, theory and behaviour change techniques used. Limited efficacy and application of theory was found. Knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy were not increased in any intervention. No gender differences in communication behaviour were encountered in interventions that recruited men and women. Two studies reported an evaluation of acceptability, which showed that the interventions were well received by patients and health professionals. No study reported the involvement of the target population in any phase of intervention development. Given the lack of health psychology-informed interventions in this area of clinical genetics, we recommend genetic health professionals, health psychologists and patients collaborate on all stages of future interventions that involve the cascading of genetic health information within families. We also provide guidance regarding use of theory and intervention elements for future intervention development.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 1002
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[41]   Communication of Information about Genetic Risks: Putting Families at the Center [J].
Mendes, Alvaro ;
Metcalfe, Alison ;
Paneque, Milena ;
Sousa, Liliana ;
Clarke, Angus J. ;
Sequeiros, Jorge .
FAMILY PROCESS, 2018, 57 (03) :836-846
[42]   How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence [J].
Mendes, Alvaro ;
Paneque, Milena ;
Sousa, Liliana ;
Clarke, Angus ;
Sequeiros, Jorge .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (03) :315-325
[43]  
Michie S, 2014, ABC BEHAV CHANGE THE
[44]   Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop [J].
Michie, Susan ;
Yardley, Lucy ;
West, Robert ;
Patrick, Kevin ;
Greaves, Felix .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (06)
[45]   The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions [J].
Michie, Susan ;
Richardson, Michelle ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Francis, Jill ;
Hardeman, Wendy ;
Eccles, Martin P. ;
Cane, James ;
Wood, Caroline E. .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 46 (01) :81-95
[46]  
Moher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
[47]   Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial [J].
Montgomery, Susan V. ;
Barsevick, Andrea M. ;
Egleston, Brian L. ;
Bingler, Ruth ;
Ruth, Karen ;
Miller, Suzanne M. ;
Malick, John ;
Cescon, Terrence P. ;
Daly, Mary B. .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2013, 12 (03) :537-546
[48]  
Morrison L., 2018, The European Health Psychologist, V20, P464
[49]  
NHS, 2019, GEN GEN TEST NHS
[50]  
Norris E, 2014, PSYCHOLOGIST, V27, P709