Involvement of methodological experts and the quality of clinical practice guidelines: a critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines and a questionnaire survey of the development groups in Japan

被引:1
作者
Hatakeyama, Yosuke [1 ]
Seto, Kanako [1 ]
Onishi, Ryo [1 ]
Hirata, Koki [1 ]
Matsumoto, Kunichika [1 ]
Wu, Yinghui [2 ]
Hasegawa, Tomonori [1 ]
机构
[1] Toho Univ, Sch Med, Ota ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 05期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Health informatics; Health & safety; Health policy; Quality in health care; SOCIAL MEDICINE; Protocols & guidelines; AGREE II; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; ADHERENCE; COST;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063639
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the involvement of methodological experts improves the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) after adjusting for other factors.SettingThe quality of Japanese CPGs published in 2011-2019 was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. A questionnaire survey targeting CPG development groups was conducted through postal mail.Participants405 CPGs were retrieved from a Japanese CPG clearinghouse. Questionnaires were distributed to the 405 CPG development groups. Of the 178 respondents, 22 were excluded because of missing values. Finally, 156 participants representing their CPG development groups were included in the analysis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresCPG quality was assessed using the AGREE II tool. The characteristics of CPGs, including publication year, development organisation, versions, number of members in the development group and involvement of methodological experts, were corrected from the description in the CPGs and the questionnaire survey. We performed multiple logistic regressions using the quality of CPGs as the dependent variable and the involvement of experts as the independent variable, adjusting for other possible factors.ResultsA total of 156 CPGs were included. Expert involvement was significantly associated with the AGREE II instrument scores in domains 1 (beta=0.207), 2 (beta=0.370), 3 (beta=0.413), 4 (beta=0.289), 5 (beta=0.375), 6 (beta=0.240) and overall (beta=0.344).ConclusionThis study revealed that the involvement of methodological experts in the CPG development process improves the quality of CPGs. The results suggest the importance of establishing a training and certification programme for experts and constructing expert referral systems that meet CPG developers' needs to improve the quality of CPGs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] AGREE Next Steps Consortium, 2019, AGR 2 INSTR
  • [2] Senior GRADE methodologists encounter challenges as part of WHO guideline development panels: an inductive content analysis
    Alexander, Paul E.
    Li, Shelly-Anne
    Gionfriddo, Michael R.
    Stoltzfus, Rebecca J.
    Neumann, Ignacio
    Brito, Juan P.
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Montori, Victor M.
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 70 : 123 - 128
  • [3] Assessing the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region: A Systematic Review
    Almazrou, Saja H.
    Alsubki, Layan A.
    Alsaigh, Norah A.
    Aldhubaib, Wadha H.
    Ghazwani, Sharifah M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2021, 14 : 297 - 309
  • [4] The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Irfan, Affan
    Sola, Ivan
    Gich, Ignasi
    Delgado-Noguera, Mario
    Rigau, David
    Tort, Sera
    Bonfill, Xavier
    Burgers, Jako
    Schunemann, Holger
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (06): : e58
  • [5] International alliance and AGREE-ment of 71 clinical practice guidelines on the management of critical care patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review
    Amer, Yasser S.
    Titi, Maher A.
    Godah, Mohammad W.
    Wahabi, Hayfaa A.
    Hneiny, Layal
    Abouelkheir, Manal Mohamed
    Hamad, Muddathir H.
    ElGohary, Ghada Metwally
    Ben Hamouda, Mohamed
    Ouertatani, Hella
    Velasquez-Salazar, Pamela
    Acosta-Reyes, Jorge
    Alhabib, Samia M.
    Esmaeil, Samia Ahmed
    Fedorowicz, Zbys
    Zhang, Ailing
    Chen, Zhe
    Liptrott, Sarah Jayne
    Frungillo, Niccolo
    Jamal, Amr A.
    Almustanyir, Sami A.
    Dieyi, Newman Ugochukwu
    Powell, John
    Hon, Katrina J.
    Alzeidan, Rasmieh
    Azzo, Majduldeen
    Zambrano-Rico, Sara
    Ramirez-Jaramillo, Paulina
    Florez, Ivan D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 142 : 333 - 370
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1990, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS
  • [8] Guidelines for Guidelines: Are They Up to the Task? A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbooks
    Ansari, Shabnam
    Rashidian, Arash
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [9] Response to Comment on "Guideline Assessment Project: Filling the GAP in Surgical Guidelines: Quality Improvement Initiative by an International Working Group''
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Antoniou, George A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 270 (06) : E126 - E126
  • [10] Improvement evident but still necessary in clinical practice guideline quality: a systematic review
    Armstrong, James Jacob
    Goldfarb, Alexander M.
    Instrum, Ryan S.
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 81 : 13 - 21