Frame-based formulaic features in L2 writing pedagogy: Variants, functions, and student writer perceptions in academic writing

被引:3
作者
Casal, Elliott [1 ]
Yoon, Jungwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept English, Patterson Hall, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept English, 262 Posner,5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Phrase-frames; Formulaic language; Corpus linguistics; L2 writing instruction; Conference abstracts; LEXICAL BUNDLES; RESEARCH ARTICLES; CORPUS-DRIVEN; ENGLISH; LANGUAGE; SEQUENCES; LIST; LINGUISTICS; ASSOCIATION; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.esp.2023.03.004
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes formulaic language in conference abstracts in Applied Linguistics and tracks an application of the findings to a second language English academic writing context. Specifically, the authors identify and profile phrase-frames (a form of discontin-uous formulaic sequence) in terms of their frequency, internal variation, predictability, structure, and rhetorical functions in a corpus of approximately 1,600 conference abstracts in Applied Linguistics. The analysis informed a corpus-and genre-based second language writing pedagogical intervention on formulaic language, and the paper also presents the experiences of learners through sample student writing, survey, and interview data. Overall, findings highlight the pedagogical potential for including frame-based formulaic language in second language writing pedagogy due to the prevalence and inherent pro-ductivity of such features, the clear role they play in signaling functional intentions in rhetoric, and their ability to stimulate reflection and discussion of formulaicity in writing more broadly. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 114
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The impact of collocational proficiency features on expert ratings of L2 English learners' writing [J].
Naismith, Ben ;
Juffs, Alan .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2025,
[42]   L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer [J].
Kobayashi, Hiroe ;
Rinnert, Carol .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2013, 22 (01) :4-33
[43]   Comprehending, envisioning and practicing: The mediating effects of EFL university students' future L2 writing selves on the relationship between academic writing beliefs and task engagement [J].
Gong, Kaixuan ;
Pang, Hongmei .
SYSTEM, 2025, 128
[44]   Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment [J].
Lu, Xiaofei .
LANGUAGE TESTING, 2017, 34 (04) :493-511
[45]   Metadiscourse Use in L2 Student Essay Writing: A Longitudinal Cross-Contextual Comparison [J].
Ruan, Zhoulin .
CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2019, 42 (04) :466-487
[46]   Lexical bundles in L2 English academic texts: Relationships with holistic assessments of writing quality [J].
Appel, Randy .
SYSTEM, 2022, 110
[47]   Beyond Accuracy: L2 Graduate Students? Evaluation of Word and Phrase Suitability in Academic Writing [J].
Loo, Daron Benjamin .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF ELT RESEARCH, 2022, 19 (01) :34-49
[48]   Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing [J].
Neumann, Heike ;
McDonough, Kim .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2015, 27 :84-104
[49]   Unlocking the Mysteries of Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in L2 English for Engineering Students [J].
Siu, Barbara Wing Yee ;
Afzaal, Muhammad ;
Aldayel, Hessah Saleh ;
Curle, Samantha .
SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (04)
[50]   Dynamism of collocation in L2 English writing: A bigram-based study [J].
Qian, Yubin .
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2022, 60 (02) :339-362