On group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer (2022)

被引:0
|
作者
Pesta, Bryan J.
te Nijenhuis, Jan [1 ]
Lasker, Jordan [2 ]
Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.
Fuerst, John G. R.
机构
[1] Gwangju Alzheimers Dis & Related Dementias Cohort, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Scarr-Rowe hypothesis; Intelligence; Heritability; SES; Race differences; Ethnic differences; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS INTERACTION; SOCIAL-CLASS; RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES; EUROPEAN-AMERICAN; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; LOUISVILLE TWIN; IQ; ADOLESCENTS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2023.101737
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Here we reply to Giangrande and Turkheimer's (2022; G&T) recent critique of a meta-analysis we published in Intelligence regarding the Scarr-Rowe Hypothesis and the apparent lack of putative race/ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence (Pesta et al., 2020). Our rebuttal is divided into three sections that address ubiquitous misstatements in their critique: Section 1 focuses on conceptual and theoretical points. Section 2 addresses methodological, statistical, and interpretative points. Section 3 provides new analyses suggested by G&T that support our original interpretations. We note that G&T published their critique in Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS), which did not invite us to respond before their paper was published and our sub-sequent submission of a rebuttal was not accepted. Our unsuccessful appeal of these events based on possible ethics violations is detailed here (Appendix E). We recognize that this is a controversial area of research with legitimate disagreements and hope our responses maintain a degree of rigor and professionalism that others can emulate.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 9 条