Varieties of welfare markets from a street-level perspective: Comparing long-term care services in Germany and Israel

被引:7
作者
Cohen, Nissim [1 ]
Klenk, Tanja [2 ]
Davidovitz, Maayan [3 ]
Cardaun, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Div Publ Adm & Policy, Haifa, Israel
[2] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Univ Fed Armed Forces Hamburg, Professorship Publ Policy & Publ Adm, Hamburg, Germany
[3] NYU, Wagner Grad Sch Publ Serv, New York, NY 10003 USA
[4] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Univ Fed Armed Forces Hamburg, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
INSURANCE; CONTEXTS; CLIENTS; WORKERS; VIEWS; STATE;
D O I
10.1111/puar.13549
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
How does the marketization of social service provision impact the practices of street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) towards their clients? To explore this question, we compare the markets for ambulatory long-term care for the elderly in Germany and Israel, which differ in the latitude of choice offered to clients and the intensity of state regulation. Based on 52 qualitative interviews with SLBs and managers of care providers, our study shows that in both countries, institutional contexts play a significant role in shaping street-level bureaucracy practices. We found that SLBs and managers in Israel engage in entrepreneurial behavior, whereas their German counterparts adopt administrative practices. By identifying these tendencies as responses to the respective welfare market characteristics, the article makes an important contribution to the field of comparative SLB research and furthers our understanding of the broader implications of the marketization of welfare services.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 428
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Privatisation and new modes of state intervention: The long-term care programme in Israel [J].
Ajzenstadt, M ;
Rosenhek, Z .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2000, 29 :247-262
[2]   Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing home quality and access [J].
Amirkhanyan, Anna A. ;
Kim, Hyun Joon ;
Lambright, Kristina T. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 27 (02) :326-353
[3]   The Long-Term Care Insurance Program in Israel: solidarity with the elderly in a changing society [J].
Asiskovitch, Sharon .
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2013, 2
[4]   The Logics of Hybrid Accountability: When the State, the Market, and Professionalism Interact [J].
Benish, Avishai .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 691 (01) :295-310
[6]   From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control [J].
Bovens, M ;
Zouridis, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2002, 62 (02) :174-184
[7]  
Braithwaite J., 2007, Regulating aged care: Ritualism and the new pyramid
[8]   Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism [J].
Brodkin, Evelyn Z. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2011, 21 :I253-I277
[9]  
Brodsky J., 2000, Long-term care laws in five developed countries: a review
[10]  
Chernichovsky D., 2017, Long-Term Care in Israel: Funding and Organization Issues