Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Lin, Haomin [1 ]
Zhang, Jinchang [1 ]
Li, Xujia [1 ]
Li, Yuanquan [2 ]
Su, Song [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg Hepatobiliary Surg, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Network meta-analysis; Gallbladder diseases; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SITE CHOLECYSTECTOMY; PORT; MULTICENTER; COSMESIS;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-022-01387-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Benign gallbladder diseases are common in surgery department, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for benign diseases of gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is conventionally performed using four laparoscopic ports. However, the clinical application of different LCs is equivocal and there is no comprehensive comparison to explore which surgical options could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases. A network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy of the different LCs could benefit patients with benign gallbladder diseases by comprehensive comparison. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochran Library. Totally, 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1627) met study selection criteria and were incorporated in this NMA study. The first ranking probabilities of the five surgical options to alleviate postoperative pain scores were: 54.4% for single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC), 25.2% for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SALC), and 24.9% for mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Mini). The first ranking probabilities for reducing postoperative complications in the surgical options were: 61.3% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 21.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing hospital stay(days) in the surgical options were: 32.3% for SIRC, 29.0% for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 19.8% for four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first ranking probabilities for reducing operation time showed that the three-port technique had the shortest operation time, followed by three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (51.3%), four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (26.8%), and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (21.6%). Our study found that the optimal surgical plan for different outcomes varies, making it difficult to give a comprehensive recommendation. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be the best options in terms of reducing surgical complications and operative time. Meanwhile, SIRC is the best options for relieving postoperative pain relief. SIRC and three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce hospital stay (days) compared other LCs.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 51
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Abd Ellatif, Mohamed E.
    Askar, Waleed A.
    Abbas, Ashraf E.
    Noaman, Nashat
    Negm, Ahmed
    El-Morsy, Gamal
    El Nakeeb, Ayman
    Magdy, Alaa
    Amin, Mahmoud
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06): : 1896 - 1906
  • [2] Branch of Biliary Surgery C.S.o.S.C.M.A. and S., 2022, ZHONGHUA WAI KE ZA Z, V60, P4
  • [3] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial study
    Dabbagh, Najmeh
    Soroosh, Ahmadreza
    Khorgami, Zhamak
    Shojaeifard, Abolfazl
    Jafari, Mehdi
    Abdehgah, Ali Ghorbani
    Mahmudzade, Hossein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 20 (12): : 1153 - 1159
  • [4] Eroler E, 2016, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V9, P11558
  • [5] New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature
    Gaillard, Martin
    Tranchart, Hadrien
    Lainas, Panagiotis
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (10): : 243 - 248
  • [6] Acute cholecystitis: comparing clinical outcomes with TG13 severity and intended laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in difficult operative cases
    Gerard, Justin
    Luu, Minh B.
    Poirier, Jennifer
    Deziel, Daniel J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (09): : 3943 - 3948
  • [7] Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial
    Grochola, Lukasz Filip
    Soll, Christopher
    Zehnder, Adrian
    Wyss, Roland
    Herzog, Pascal
    Breitenstein, Stefan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05): : 1482 - 1490
  • [8] Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of three-port vs four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (level 1 evidence)
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Finch, David A.
    Mohamedahmed, Ali Yasen Y.
    Iskandar, Amir
    Venkatesan, Gowtham
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Satyadas, Thomas
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (02) : 451 - 471
  • [9] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Caiwen
    Shan, Xinyi
    Yao, Liang
    Yan, Peijing
    Li, Meixuan
    Hu, Lidong
    Tian, Hongwei
    Jing, Wutang
    Du, Binbin
    Wang, Lixia
    Yang, Kehu
    Guo, Tiankang
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (11): : 4377 - 4392
  • [10] Quality of life after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, clinical trial
    Ito, Eitaro
    Takai, Akihiro
    Imai, Yoshinori
    Otani, Hiromi
    Onishi, Yoshihiro
    Yamamoto, Yosuke
    Ogawa, Kohei
    Tohyama, Taiji
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    [J]. SURGERY, 2019, 165 (02) : 353 - 359