Artificial intelligence for triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms and workload reduction: A meta-analysis of a deep learning software

被引:1
作者
Xavier, Debora [1 ,8 ]
Miyawaki, Isabele [2 ]
Campello Jorge, Carlos Alberto [3 ]
Freitas Silva, Gabriela Batalini [4 ]
Lloyd, Maxwell [5 ]
Moraes, Fabio [6 ]
Patel, Bhavika [7 ]
Batalini, Felipe [7 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ, Belem, PA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil
[4] Hosp Municipal Joao Caires, Prado Ferreira, PR, Brazil
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[6] Queens Univ, Dept Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[8] Fed Univ Para, 01 Augusto Correa Av,Guama, BR-66075110 Belem, PA, Brazil
关键词
Artificial intelligence; breast cancer; cancer screening; deep learning; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1177/09691413231219952
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Deep learning (DL) has shown promising results for improving mammographic breast cancer diagnosis. However, the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the breast cancer screening process has not yet been fully elucidated in terms of potential workload reduction. We aim to assess if AI-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms could reduce the radiologist's workload with non-inferior sensitivity.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated AI algorithms on computer-aided triage of breast cancer screening mammograms. We extracted data from homogenous studies and performed a proportion meta-analysis with a random-effects model to examine the radiologist's workload reduction (proportion of low-risk mammograms that could be theoretically ruled out from human's assessment) and the software's sensitivity to breast cancer detection.Results: Thirteen studies were selected for full review, and three studies that used the same commercially available DL algorithm were included in the meta-analysis. In the 156,852 examinations included, the threshold of 7 was identified as optimal. With these parameters, radiologist workload decreased by 68.3% (95%CI 0.655-0.711, I-2 = 98.76%, p < 0.001), while achieving a sensitivity of 93.1% (95%CI 0.882-0.979, I-2 = 83.86%, p = 0.002) and a specificity of 68.7% (95% CI 0.684-0.723, I-2 = 97.5%, p < 0.01).Conclusions: The deployment of DL computer-aided triage of breast cancer screening mammograms reduces the radiology workload while maintaining high sensitivity. Although the implementation of AI remains complex and heterogeneous, it is a promising tool to optimize healthcare resources.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated medical literature screening using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, Yunying
    Liang, Siyu
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Chen, Shi
    Wang, Qing
    Huang, Tianze
    Sun, Feng
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Zhu, Huijuan
    Pan, Hui
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (08) : 1425 - 1432
  • [42] Application of CT and MRI images based on an artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    Cheng-Jie Liu
    Lei Zhang
    Yi Sun
    Lei Geng
    Rui Wang
    Kai-Min Shi
    Jin-Xin Wan
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [43] Application of CT and MRI images based on an artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Cheng-Jie
    Zhang, Lei
    Sun, Yi
    Geng, Lei
    Wang, Rui
    Shi, Kai-Min
    Wan, Jin-Xin
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] Deep Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Forte, Gabriele C.
    Altmayer, Stephan
    Silva, Ricardo F.
    Stefani, Mariana T.
    Libermann, Lucas L.
    Cavion, Cesar C.
    Youssef, Ali
    Forghani, Reza
    King, Jeremy
    Mohamed, Tan-Lucien
    Andrade, Rubens G. F.
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [45] Analysis of mammograms using artificial intelligence to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: proof of concept
    I. Skarping
    M. Larsson
    D. Förnvik
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 3131 - 3141
  • [46] Magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis
    Ding, Wu
    Fan, Zaiwei
    Xu, Yuehuai
    Wei, Chunshou
    Li, Zhian
    Lin, Yingli
    Zhu, Jianming
    Ruan, Guodong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (10) : E33146
  • [47] Deep learning versus ophthalmologists for screening for glaucoma on fundus examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buisson, Mathieu
    Navel, Valentin
    Labbe, Antoine
    Watson, Stephanie L.
    Baker, Julien S.
    Murtagh, Patrick
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Dutheil, Frederic
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 49 (09) : 1027 - 1038
  • [48] Accuracy of ultrasonic artificial intelligence in diagnosing benign and malignant breast diseases A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Qiyu
    Qu, Meijing
    Sun, Lipeng
    Wang, Hui
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (50) : E28289
  • [49] Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnoses of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mitchell, Sian
    Nikolopoulos, Manolis
    El-Zarka, Alaa
    Al-Karawi, Dhurgham
    Al-Zaidi, Shakir
    Ghai, Avi
    Gaughran, Jonathan E.
    Sayasneh, Ahmad
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [50] Interval breast cancer rates for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography population screening: An individual participant data meta-analysis
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Soerensen, Anne L.
    Robledo, Kristy P.
    Hunter, Kylie
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Lang, Kristina
    Johnson, Kristin
    Aglen, Camilla F.
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 34