Clinical Application of the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Score for Reporting Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

被引:4
作者
Aerts, Jan [1 ]
Hendrickx, Sigi [2 ]
Berquin, Camille [1 ]
Lumen, Nicolaas [1 ]
Verbeke, Sofie [3 ]
Villeirs, Geert [2 ]
Van Praet, Charles [1 ]
De Visschere, Pieter [2 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ghent, Belgium
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE | 2023年 / 56卷
关键词
Active surveillance; Follow-up; Imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate Cancer Radiological; Estimation of Change in; Sequential Evaluation; Prostate cancer; GUIDELINES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.euros.2023.08.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) score has been developed to standardise prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reporting in men on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa).Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of PRECISE scoring and assess its diagnostic accuracy.Design, setting, and participants: All PCa patients on AS with a baseline MRI and at least one follow-up MRI scan between January 2008 and September 2022 at a single tertiary referral centre were included in a database. The follow-up protocol of the Prostate Cancer International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study was used. All scans were retrospectively re-reported by a dedicated uroradiologist and appointed a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2.1) and PRECISE score.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Clinically significant progression was defined by histopathological upgrading (on biopsy or radical prostatectomy) to grade group >= 3 and/or evolution to T3 stage. A survival analysis was performed to assess differential progression-free survival (PFS) according to the PRECISE score.Results and limitations: A total of 188 patients were included for an analysis with a total of 358 repeat MRI scans and 144 repeat biopsies. The median follow-up was 46 mo (interquartile range 21-74). Radiological progression (PRECISE 4-5) had sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of, respectively, 78%, 70%, 90%, and 49% for clinically significant progression. Four-year PFS was 91% for PRECISE 1-3 versus 66% for PRECISE 4-5 (p < 0.001). In total, 137 patients underwent a confirmation MRI scan within 18 mo after diagnosis. Four-year PFS in this group was 81% for PRECISE 1-3 versus 43% for PRECISE 4-5 (p < 0.001). Limitations include retrospective design and no strict adherence to AS protocol.Conclusions: Implementation of PRECISE scoring for PCa patients on AS is feasible and offers a prognostic value. Patients with PRECISE score 4-5 on confirmation MRI within 18 mo after diagnosis have a three-fold higher risk of clinically significant progression after 4 yr.Patient summary: Patients with low-risk prostate cancer can be followed up care-fully. In this study, we evaluate the standardised reporting of repeat magnetic res-onance imaging scans (using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation [PRECISE] recommendations). PRECISE scoring is feasible and helps identify patients in need of further treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Pickles, Tom
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 954 - 960
  • [2] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [3] MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance
    Caglic, Iztok
    Sushentsev, Nikita
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Sala, Evis
    Shaida, Nadeem
    Koo, Brendan C.
    Kozlov, Vasily
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 2696 - 2705
  • [4] Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne
    Giganti, Francesco
    Bonekamp, David
    Kesch, Claudia
    Mueller-Wolf, Maya B.
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Gasch, Claudia
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Hauffe, Marcus
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Duensing, Stefan
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (01): : 102 - 110
  • [5] Promoting the use of the PRECISE score for prostate MRI during active surveillance: results from the ESOR Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis teaching fellowship
    Giganti, Francesco
    Aupin, Laurene
    Thoumin, Camille
    Faouzi, Ingrid
    Monnier, Hippolyte
    Fontaine, Matthieu
    Navidi, Alexandre
    Ritvo, Paul-Gydeon
    Ong, Valentin
    Chung, Cecile
    Bibi, Imen
    Lehrer, Raphaele
    Hermieu, Nicolas
    Barret, Eric
    Ambrosi, Alessandro
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Emberton, Mark
    Allen, Clare
    Kirkham, Alex
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [6] Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial
    Giganti, Francesco
    Allen, Clare
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 615 - 619
  • [7] Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort
    Giganti, Francesco
    Stabile, Armando
    Stavrinides, Vasilis
    Osinibi, Elizabeth
    Retter, Adam
    Orczyk, Clement
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Freeman, Alex
    Haider, Aiman
    Punwani, Shonit
    Allen, Clare
    Kirkham, Alex
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (03) : 1644 - 1655
  • [8] Interobserver reproducibility of the PRECISE scoring system for prostate MRI on active surveillance: results from a two-centre pilot study
    Giganti, Francesco
    Pecoraro, Martina
    Stavrinides, Vasilis
    Stabile, Armando
    Cipollari, Stefano
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Kirkham, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Punwani, Shonit
    Emberton, Mark
    Catalano, Carlo
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Panebianco, Valeria
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2082 - 2090
  • [9] Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial
    Klotz, Laurence
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Sugar, Linda
    Moussa, Madeline
    Berman, David M.
    Van der Kwast, Theo
    Vesprini, Danny
    Milot, Laurent
    Kebabdjian, Marlene
    Fleshner, Neil
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Chin, Joe
    Pond, Gregory R.
    Haider, Masoom
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (02) : 300 - 309
  • [10] What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel
    Moldovan, Paul C.
    Van den Broeck, Thomas
    Sylvester, Richard
    Marconi, Lorenzo
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Bolla, Michel
    Briers, Erik
    Cumberbatch, Marcus G.
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gross, Tobias
    Henry, Ann M.
    Joniau, Steven
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Matveev, Vsevolod B.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    De Santis, Maria
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Yuan, Cathy Yuhong
    Cornford, Philip
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 250 - 266