De Novo Mutation Rates in Sticklebacks

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Chaowei [1 ]
Reid, Kerry [1 ]
Sands, Arthur F. [1 ]
Fraimout, Antoine [1 ,2 ]
Schierup, Mikkel Heide [3 ]
Merila, Juha [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Sch Biol Sci, Area Ecol & Biodivers, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Res Program Organismal & Evolutionary Biol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Aarhus Univ, Bioinformat Res Ctr, Aarhus, Denmark
基金
芬兰科学院; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
mutation rate; divergence time; genetic diversity; germline mutation rate; ninespine stickleback; GERMLINE MUTATION; DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; EVOLUTION; PUNGITIUS; GENOME; METHYLATION; SEQUENCES; PATTERNS; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msad192
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mutation rate is a fundamental parameter in population genetics. Apart from being an important scaling parameter for demographic and phylogenetic inference, it allows one to understand at what rate new genetic diversity is generated and what the expected level of genetic diversity is in a population at equilibrium. However, except for well-established model organisms, accurate estimates of de novo mutation rates are available for a very limited number of organisms from the wild. We estimated mutation rates (mu) in two marine populations of the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) with the aid of several 2- and 3-generational family pedigrees, deep (>50x) whole-genome resequences and a high-quality reference genome. After stringent filtering, we discovered 308 germline mutations in 106 offspring translating to mu = 4.83 x 10(-9) and mu = 4.29 x 10(-9) per base per generation in the two populations, respectively. Up to 20% of the mutations were shared by full-sibs showing that the level of parental mosaicism was relatively high. Since the estimated mu was 3.1 times smaller than the commonly used substitution rate, recalibration with mu led to substantial increase in estimated divergence times between different stickleback species. Our estimates of the de novo mutation rate should provide a useful resource for research focused on fish population genetics and that of sticklebacks in particular.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of parental age and polymer composition on short tandem repeat de novo mutation rates
    Goldberg, Michael E.
    Noyes, Michelle D.
    Eichler, Evan E.
    Quinlan, Aaron R.
    Harris, Kelley
    GENETICS, 2024, 226 (04)
  • [2] Germline de novo mutation rates on exons versus introns in humans
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Miguel
    Casillas, Sonia
    Weghorn, Donate
    Barbadilla, Antonio
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [3] Insights Into de novo Mutation Variation in Lithuanian Exome
    Pranckoniene, Laura
    Jakaitieno, Audrono
    Ambrozaityte, Laima
    Kavaliauskiene, Ingrida
    Kucinskas, Vaidutis
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2018, 9
  • [4] Novel variation and de novo mutation rates in population-wide de novo assembled Danish trios
    Besenbacher, Soren
    Liu, Siyang
    Izarzugaza, Jose M. G.
    Grove, Jakob
    Belling, Kirstine
    Bork-Jensen, Jette
    Huang, Shujia
    Als, Thomas D.
    Li, Shengting
    Yadav, Rachita
    Rubio-Garcia, Arcadio
    Lescai, Francesco
    Demontis, Ditte
    Rao, Junhua
    Ye, Weijian
    Mailund, Thomas
    Friborg, Rune M.
    Pedersen, Christian N. S.
    Xu, Ruiqi
    Sun, Jihua
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Ou
    Cheng, Xiaofang
    Flores, David
    Rydza, Emil
    Rapacki, Kristoffer
    Sorensen, John Damm
    Chmura, Piotr
    Westergaard, David
    Dworzynski, Piotr
    Sorensen, Thorkild I. A.
    Lund, Ole
    Hansen, Torben
    Xu, Xun
    Li, Ning
    Bolund, Lars
    Pedersen, Oluf
    Eiberg, Hans
    Krogh, Anders
    Borglum, Anders D.
    Brunak, Soren
    Kristiansen, Karsten
    Schierup, Mikkel H.
    Wang, Jun
    Gupta, Ramneek
    Villesen, Palle
    Rasmussen, Simon
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [5] De Novo Mutation Rate Variation and Its Determinants in Chlamydomonas
    Lopez-Cortegano, Eugenio
    Craig, Rory J.
    Chebib, Jobran
    Samuels, Toby
    Morgan, Andrew D.
    Kraemer, Susanne A.
    Boendel, Katharina B.
    Ness, Rob W.
    Colegrave, Nick
    Keightley, Peter D.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 38 (09) : 3709 - 3723
  • [6] De Novo Mutation Rate Estimation in Wolves of Known Pedigree
    Koch, Evan M.
    Schweizer, Rena M.
    Schweizer, Teia M.
    Stahler, Daniel R.
    Smith, Douglas W.
    Wayne, Robert K.
    Novembre, John
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 36 (11) : 2536 - 2547
  • [7] Germline mutation: de novo mutation in reproductive lineage cells
    Sakumi, Kunihiko
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2019, 94 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [8] Rates and spectra of de novo structural mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
    Lopez-Cortegano, Eugenio
    Craig, Rory J.
    Chebib, Jobran
    Balogun, Eniolaye J.
    Keightley, Peter D.
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (01) : 45 - 60
  • [9] De novo mutation rates at the single-mutation resolution in a human HBB gene region associated with adaptation and genetic disease
    Melamed, Daniel
    Nov, Yuval
    Malik, Assaf
    Yakass, Michael B.
    Bolotin, Evgeni
    Shemer, Revital
    Hiadzi, Edem K.
    Skorecki, Karl L.
    Livnat, Adi
    GENOME RESEARCH, 2022, 32 (03) : 488 - 498
  • [10] A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease
    Samocha, Kaitlin E.
    Robinson, Elise B.
    Sanders, Stephan J.
    Stevens, Christine
    Sabo, Aniko
    McGrath, Lauren M.
    Kosmicki, Jack A.
    Rehnstrom, Karola
    Mallick, Swapan
    Kirby, Andrew
    Wall, Dennis P.
    MacArthur, Daniel G.
    Gabriel, Stacey B.
    DePristo, Mark
    Purcell, Shaun M.
    Palotie, Aarno
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Buxbaum, Joseph D.
    Cook, Edwin H., Jr.
    Gibbs, Richard A.
    Schellenberg, Gerard D.
    Sutcliffe, James S.
    Devlin, Bernie
    Roeder, Kathryn
    Neale, Benjamin M.
    Daly, Mark J.
    NATURE GENETICS, 2014, 46 (09) : 944 - +