Air-water properties of unsteady breaking bore part 2: Void fraction and bubble statistics

被引:8
作者
Shi, Rui [1 ]
Wuthrich, Davide [1 ,2 ]
Chanson, Hubert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Civil Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Hydraul Engn, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Unsteady gas-liquid flow; Breaking bore; Dual-tip phase detection probe; Image processing; Void fraction; Bubble clustering; Bubble size spectrum; LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS; PROBE MEASUREMENTS; HYDRAULIC JUMP; 2-PHASE FLOW; ENTRAINMENT; TURBULENCE; COLUMN; WAVES; DISTRIBUTIONS; DISSIPATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104337
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Continuing from the part 1 (Shi et al., 2022) this paper presents an experimental investigation of transient void fraction and bubble statistics in a highly turbulent breaking bore with Fr1 = 2.4. The measurements were conducted using a combination of dual-tip phase-detection probes and an ultra-high-speed video camera. The enclosed bubble detection technique (EBDT) used the synchronised probe and camera signals to provide the contour of instantaneous void fraction in the bore roller. The ensemble-averaged void fraction was derived, and compared to analytical solutions of air diffusion models. The bubble statistics were characterised by the bubble clustering properties, pseudo bubble count rate and bubble size spectrum. The clustering data showed the non-random bubble grouping in the shear layer, and the bubble size distributions N(r) followed a commonly adopted bubble break-up model: N(r) a r(-m), where r was the equivalent bubble radius in the present study. The comparison indicated that, in the breaking bore, its air diffusion process was similar to that in a stationary hydraulic jump, and the bubble break-up process was comparable to that in breaking waves.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Abramoff M.D., 2004, Biophotonics International, V11, P36, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420005615.AX4
[2]   Void fraction measurements in breaking waves [J].
Blenkinsopp, C. E. ;
Chaplin, J. R. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 463 (2088) :3151-3170
[3]   Bubble Size Measurements in Breaking Waves Using Optical Fiber Phase Detection Probes [J].
Blenkinsopp, Christopher E. ;
Chaplin, John R. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 35 (02) :388-401
[4]   The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description [J].
Brocchini, M ;
Peregrine, DH .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2001, 449 :225-254
[5]   Planar shadow image velocimetry for the analysis of the hydrodynamics in bubbly flows [J].
Broeder, D. ;
Sommerfeld, M. .
MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 18 (08) :2513-2528
[6]   The influence of air and scale on wave impact pressures [J].
Bullock, GN ;
Crawford, AR ;
Hewson, PJ ;
Walkden, MJA ;
Bird, PAD .
COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 42 (04) :291-312
[7]   LOCAL PHASE DETECTION PROBES IN FLUID FLUID 2-PHASE FLOWS [J].
CARTELLIER, A ;
ACHARD, JL .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1991, 62 (02) :279-303
[8]   Development of a deep learning-based image processing technique for bubble pattern recognition and shape reconstruction in dense bubbly flows [J].
Cerqueira, Rafael F. L. ;
Paladino Sinmec, Emilio E. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 230
[9]   Flow regime identification and classification based on void fraction and differential pressure of vertical two-phase flow in rectangular channel [J].
Chalgeri, Vikrant Siddharudh ;
Jeong, Ji Hwan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2019, 132 :802-816
[10]   Bubble entrainment and dispersion in plunging jet flows: Freshwater vs. seawater [J].
Chanson, H. ;
Aoki, S. ;
Hoque, A. .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 22 (03) :664-677