Impact of environmental regulations on the industrial eco-efficiency in China-based on the strong porter hypothesis and the weak porter hypothesis

被引:16
作者
Zhong, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Hamzah, Hanny Zurina [1 ]
Yin, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Desheng [3 ]
Cao, Jianhong [1 ,6 ]
Mao, Xiaoming [4 ]
Li, Hong [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Sch Business & Econ, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
[2] Pingxiang Univ, Sch Business, Pingxiang 337055, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
[4] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Sch Foreign Language, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Yuquan Inst, Beijing 100000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulations; Industrial eco-efficiency; Sub-sectors; Pollution intensity; Strong Porter hypothesis; Weak Porter hypothesis; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMY; ENERGY; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-25410-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an important indicator of sustainable development, industrial eco-efficiency (IEE) has aroused growing attention from governments all over the world including China, in recent decades. The Chinese government has introduced numerous environmental regulations; however, the environmental pollution issue does not appear to have been solved. Moreover, although several earlier studies have shown that environmental regulations may promote innovation, there is no consensus on their ultimate effects on IEE. Therefore, this study took a critical look at the connection between environmental regulations and IEE in 36 Chinese sub-sectors from 2009 to 2018. Based on the weak Porter hypothesis (weak PH) and strong Porter hypothesis (strong PH), this paper constructed two panel regression models and conducted group analysis by pollution intensity to check the relationships among environmental regulations, technological innovation, and IEE. It was found that environmental regulations can improve technological innovation and IEE, but these impacts vary across different pollution groups. Specifically, environmental regulations have a U-shaped or inverted U-shaped relationship with technological innovation and IEE. Of the 36 sub-sectors, 26 prove the existence of the Weak PH while 10 verify the Strong PH, indicating that environmental regulations generally advocate technological innovation for most sub-sectors but only promote IEE in a few sub-sectors at present. Finally, differentiated policy implications for environmental regulations and technological innovation are provided for decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:44490 / 44504
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Asian countries [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 :16-22
[2]   Feasible generalized least squares for panel data with cross-sectional and serial correlations [J].
Bai, Jushan ;
Choi, Sung Hoon ;
Liao, Yuan .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 60 (01) :309-326
[3]  
Chen C., 2018, J SHANXI U FINANCE E, V3, P65, DOI [10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2018.03.006, DOI 10.13781/J.CNKI.1007-9556.2018.03.006]
[4]  
Fu J.Y., 2010, MANAGE WORLD WASTE, V10, P87, DOI DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2010.10.008
[5]   Decentralized environmental regulations and plant-level productivity [J].
Ghosal, Vivek ;
Stephan, Andreas ;
Weiss, Jan F. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (06) :998-1011
[6]  
Han G.G., 2018, Mod. Econ. Sci, V40, P84
[7]  
He Y. M., 2018, SOFT SCI, V32, P20, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2018.04.05, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2018.04.05]
[8]  
[黄庆华 Huang Qinghua], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P140
[9]   Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study [J].
Jaffe, AB ;
Palmer, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :610-619
[10]   Structural emissions reduction of China's power and heating industry under the goal of "double carbon": A perspective from input-output analysis [J].
Jiang, Tangyang ;
Yu, Yang ;
Jahanger, Atif ;
Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 31 :346-356