Doing together: reflections on facilitating the co-production of participatory action research with marginalised populations

被引:20
作者
Pettican, Anna [1 ,5 ]
Goodman, Beverley [1 ]
Bryant, Wendy [1 ]
Beresford, Peter [1 ,2 ]
Freeman, Paul [3 ]
Gladwell, Valerie [3 ,4 ]
Kilbride, Cherry [2 ]
Speed, Ewen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Colchester, England
[2] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Mary Seacole Bldg, Uxbridge, England
[3] Univ Essex, Sch Sport Rehabil & Exercise Sci, Colchester, England
[4] Univ Suffolk, Inst Hlth & Well Being, Ipswich, England
[5] Univ Essex, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Wivenhoe Pk, Colchester CO4 3SQ, England
关键词
Co-production; Participatory Action Research; Disability; Physical activity; Occupational Therapy; GO-ALONG INTERVIEWS; HEALTH; PEOPLE; PERSPECTIVES; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1080/2159676X.2022.2146164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recognising the limited literature detailing the practical application of co-production principles and practices within sport, exercise and health research, critical reflections on co-production principles and practice are shared here, drawing on two participatory action research (PAR) projects in the United Kingdom (UK). Co-production and PAR are distinguished, and their commonalities discussed. Both projects were facilitated by occupational therapists and concerned with health inequities and social justice. The Voices for Inclusive Activity project brought disabled people together online to explore more accessible and inclusive approaches to evaluate disability sport and physical activity. The Positive Mental Attitude project took place with a community-based football league for people with experience of mental distress and explored the nature and value of participation. Both projects involved researching with people who are often excluded from research. Addressing power imbalances can function to engage marginalised people in processes of knowledge production and enable social justice. Co-production offers useful principles that are democratic, inclusive, collaborative, and participatory, but the process is not straightforward. The reflections within this paper focus on the challenges and opportunities the first and second authors faced as facilitators of co-produced research. Participant and co-researcher quotes reveal how participatory methods and approaches address gaps in experiential knowledge of exclusion and marginalisation. The potential for co-produced research to influence policy and practice is outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 219
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Activity Alliance, 2022, ANN DIS ACT SURV 202
[2]  
Adomako E.S., 2020, EXPLORING STAFF SERV
[3]  
Allam A., 2021, COVID 19 COPRODUCTIO, P8
[4]  
Andrews J., 2000, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, V63, P396, DOI [DOI 10.1177/030802260006300807, 10.1177/0308022 60006300807]
[5]   Co-production in research: co-researcher perspectives on its value and challenges [J].
Atkin, Helen ;
Thomson, Louise ;
Wood, Oliver .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 83 (07) :415-417
[6]   Building capacity for knowledge translation in occupational therapy: learning through participatory action research [J].
Bennett, Sally ;
Whitehead, Mary ;
Eames, Sally ;
Fleming, Jennifer ;
Low, Shanling ;
Caldwell, Elizabeth .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 16 :1-11
[7]  
Beresford P., 2013, Nordic Social Work Research, V3, P139, DOI DOI 10.1080/2156857X.2013.835138
[8]  
Beresford P., 2021, COVID 19 COPRODUCTIO, V1
[9]  
BERESFORD P., 2013, Beyond the usual suspects
[10]   A Photovoice study of user experiences of an occupational therapy department within an acute inpatient mental health setting [J].
Birken, Mary ;
Bryant, Wendy .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2019, 82 (09) :532-543