Relative accuracy of HWRF reanalysis and a parametric wind model during the landfall of Hurricane Florence and the impacts on storm surge simulations

被引:8
作者
Rahman, Md Arifur [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Lu, Lixin [3 ]
Moghimi, Saeed [4 ]
Hu, Kelin [5 ]
Abdolali, Ali [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Bangladesh Univ Engn & Technol BUET, Dept Water Resources Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[3] Colorado State Univ, Cooperat Inst Atmospher Res, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] NOAA, Coastal Survey Dev Lab, Natl Ocean Serv, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] Tulane Univ, Dept River Coastal Sci & Engn, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[6] NOAA, Environm Modeling Ctr, Natl Ctr Environm Predict, Natl Weather Serv, College Pk, MD USA
[7] Lynker, Leesburg, VA USA
[8] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Hurricane; Wind model; Storm surge; Reanalysis; TROPICAL CYCLONE INITIALIZATION; BOUNDARY-LAYER; DRAG COEFFICIENT; PART II; PREDICTION; SURFACE; PROFILES; FORECAST; SYSTEM; VORTEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-022-05702-3
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Prediction and reanalysis of storm surge rely on wind and pressure fields from either parametric tropical cyclone wind models or numerical weather model reanalysis, and both are subject to large errors during landfall. This study assesses two sets of wind/pressure fields for Hurricane Florence that made landfall along the Carolinas in September 2018 and appraises the impacts of differential structural errors in the two suites of modeled wind fields on the predictive accuracy of storm surge driven thereby. The first set was produced using Holland 2010 (H10), and the second set is the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) reanalysis created by the NWS National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). Each is validated using a large surface data set collected at public and commercial platforms and then is used as input forcing to a 2-D coastal hydrodynamic model (Delft3D Flexible Mesh) to produce storm surge along the Carolina coasts and major sounds. Major findings include the following. First, wind fields from HWRF are overall more accurate than those based on H10 for the periphery of the storm, though they exhibit limitations in resolving high wind speeds near the center. Second, applying H10 to the best track data for Florence yields an erroneously spike in wind speed on September 15th when the storm reduced to a tropical depression. Third, HWRF wind fields exhibit a progressively negative bias after landfall, likely due to deficiencies of the model in representing boundary layer processes, and to the lack of assimilation of surface product after landfall for compensating for these deficiencies. Fourth, using HWRF reanalysis as the forcings to Delft3D yields more accurate peak surges simulations, though there is severe underestimation of surge along the shoreline close to the track center. The peak surge simulations by Delft3D are biased low when driven by H10, even though over several locations the H10 model clearly overpredicts surface wind speeds. This contrast highlights the importance of resolving wind fields further away from the center in order to accurately reproduce storm surge and associated coastal flooding.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 904
页数:36
相关论文
共 90 条
[11]   The Impact of Airborne Radio Occultation Observations on the Simulation of Hurricane Karl (2010) [J].
Chen, X. M. ;
Chen, S. -H. ;
Haase, J. S. ;
Murphy, B. J. ;
Wang, K. -N. ;
Garrison, J. L. ;
Chen, S. Y. ;
Huang, C. Y. ;
Adhikari, L. ;
Xie, F. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2018, 146 (01) :329-350
[12]   A Comparison of HWRF Six-Hourly 4DEnVar and Hourly 3DEnVar Assimilation of Inner Core Tail Dopper Radar Observations for the Prediction of Hurricane Edouard (2014) [J].
Davis, Benjamin ;
Wang, Xuguang ;
Lu, Xu .
ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
[13]  
Deltares, 2014, USER MANUAL HYDROMOR
[14]  
DEMARIA M, 1992, MON WEATHER REV, V120, P1628, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1628:ANSMFH>2.0.CO
[15]  
2
[16]   Advances in Numerical Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Modelling of Wave-Structure-Seabed Interactions and Scour [J].
Diaz-Carrasco, Pilar ;
Croquer, Sergio ;
Tamimi, Vahid ;
Lacey, Jay ;
Poncet, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (06)
[17]   Sensitivity of Storm Surge Predictions to Atmospheric Forcing during Hurricane Isaac [J].
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Muhammad, A. ;
Curcic, M. ;
Fathi, A. ;
Dawson, C. N. ;
Chen, S. S. ;
Luettich, R. A., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (01)
[18]   Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations [J].
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Zijlema, M. ;
Westerink, J. J. ;
Holthuijsen, L. H. ;
Dawson, C. ;
Luettich, R. A., Jr. ;
Jensen, R. E. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Stelling, G. S. ;
Stone, G. W. .
COASTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (01) :45-65
[19]   A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: Synoptic Description and Analysis of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita [J].
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Bunya, S. ;
Westerink, J. J. ;
Ebersole, B. A. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Atkinson, J. H. ;
Jensen, R. ;
Resio, D. T. ;
Luettich, R. A. ;
Dawson, C. ;
Cardone, V. J. ;
Cox, A. T. ;
Powell, M. D. ;
Westerink, H. J. ;
Roberts, H. J. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (02) :378-404
[20]  
Egbert GD, 2002, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V19, P183, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO