Relative accuracy of HWRF reanalysis and a parametric wind model during the landfall of Hurricane Florence and the impacts on storm surge simulations

被引:8
作者
Rahman, Md Arifur [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Lu, Lixin [3 ]
Moghimi, Saeed [4 ]
Hu, Kelin [5 ]
Abdolali, Ali [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Bangladesh Univ Engn & Technol BUET, Dept Water Resources Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[3] Colorado State Univ, Cooperat Inst Atmospher Res, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] NOAA, Coastal Survey Dev Lab, Natl Ocean Serv, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] Tulane Univ, Dept River Coastal Sci & Engn, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[6] NOAA, Environm Modeling Ctr, Natl Ctr Environm Predict, Natl Weather Serv, College Pk, MD USA
[7] Lynker, Leesburg, VA USA
[8] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Hurricane; Wind model; Storm surge; Reanalysis; TROPICAL CYCLONE INITIALIZATION; BOUNDARY-LAYER; DRAG COEFFICIENT; PART II; PREDICTION; SURFACE; PROFILES; FORECAST; SYSTEM; VORTEX;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-022-05702-3
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Prediction and reanalysis of storm surge rely on wind and pressure fields from either parametric tropical cyclone wind models or numerical weather model reanalysis, and both are subject to large errors during landfall. This study assesses two sets of wind/pressure fields for Hurricane Florence that made landfall along the Carolinas in September 2018 and appraises the impacts of differential structural errors in the two suites of modeled wind fields on the predictive accuracy of storm surge driven thereby. The first set was produced using Holland 2010 (H10), and the second set is the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) reanalysis created by the NWS National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). Each is validated using a large surface data set collected at public and commercial platforms and then is used as input forcing to a 2-D coastal hydrodynamic model (Delft3D Flexible Mesh) to produce storm surge along the Carolina coasts and major sounds. Major findings include the following. First, wind fields from HWRF are overall more accurate than those based on H10 for the periphery of the storm, though they exhibit limitations in resolving high wind speeds near the center. Second, applying H10 to the best track data for Florence yields an erroneously spike in wind speed on September 15th when the storm reduced to a tropical depression. Third, HWRF wind fields exhibit a progressively negative bias after landfall, likely due to deficiencies of the model in representing boundary layer processes, and to the lack of assimilation of surface product after landfall for compensating for these deficiencies. Fourth, using HWRF reanalysis as the forcings to Delft3D yields more accurate peak surges simulations, though there is severe underestimation of surge along the shoreline close to the track center. The peak surge simulations by Delft3D are biased low when driven by H10, even though over several locations the H10 model clearly overpredicts surface wind speeds. This contrast highlights the importance of resolving wind fields further away from the center in order to accurately reproduce storm surge and associated coastal flooding.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 904
页数:36
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Evaluating the accuracy and uncertainty of atmospheric and wave model hindcasts during severe events using model ensembles [J].
Abdolali, Ali ;
van der Westhuysen, Andre ;
Ma, Zaizhong ;
Mehra, Avichal ;
Roland, Aron ;
Moghimi, Saeed .
OCEAN DYNAMICS, 2021, 71 (02) :217-235
[2]   Shoreline Solutions: Guiding Efficient Data Selection for Coastal Risk Modeling and the Design of Adaptation Interventions [J].
Acosta-Morel, Montserrat ;
McNulty, Valerie Pietsch ;
Lummen, Natainia ;
Schill, Steven R. ;
Beck, Michael W. .
WATER, 2021, 13 (06)
[3]   A Study of the HWRF Analysis and Forecast Impact of Realistically Simulated CYGNSS Observations Assimilated as Scalar Wind Speeds and as VAM Wind Vectors [J].
Annane, Bachir ;
McNoldy, Brian ;
Leidner, S. Mark ;
Hoffman, Ross ;
Atlas, Robert ;
Majumdar, Sharanya J. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2018, 146 (07) :2221-2236
[4]   Low frequency water level correction in storm surge models using data assimilation [J].
Asher, Taylor G. ;
Luettich, Richard A., Jr. ;
Fleming, Jason G. ;
Blanton, Brian O. .
OCEAN MODELLING, 2019, 144
[5]  
Biswas MK, 2018, HURRICANE WEATHER RE, P1
[6]   Understanding the Response of Tropical Cyclone Structure to the Assimilation of Synthetic Wind Profiles [J].
Bucci, Lisa R. ;
Majumdar, Sharanya J. ;
Atlas, Robert ;
Emmitt, G. David ;
Greco, Steve .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2021, 149 (06) :2031-2047
[7]   A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: Model Development and Validation [J].
Bunya, S. ;
Dietrich, J. C. ;
Westerink, J. J. ;
Ebersole, B. A. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Atkinson, J. H. ;
Jensen, R. ;
Resio, D. T. ;
Luettich, R. A. ;
Dawson, C. ;
Cardone, V. J. ;
Cox, A. T. ;
Powell, M. D. ;
Westerink, H. J. ;
Roberts, H. J. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2010, 138 (02) :345-377
[8]   Tropical cyclone wind field forcing for surge models: critical issues and sensitivities [J].
Cardone, V. J. ;
Cox, A. T. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 51 (01) :29-47
[9]   A Model for the Complete Radial Structure of the Tropical Cyclone Wind Field. Part I: Comparison with Observed Structure* [J].
Chavas, Daniel R. ;
Lin, Ning ;
Emanuel, Kerry .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2015, 72 (09) :3647-3662
[10]   Predicting typhoon-induced storm surge tide with a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model and artificial neural network model [J].
Chen, W. -B. ;
Liu, W. -C. ;
Hsu, M. -H. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 12 (12) :3799-3809