The Effect of a Plastic Barrier Drape on Resuscitation Performance and Provider Contamination A Randomized Controlled Simulation-Based Pilot Trial

BackgroundPatient barriers to protect health care workers from COVID-19 exposure have been studied for airway management. Few are tested for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We sought to determine whether a plastic drape barrier affects resuscitation performance and contamination risks for a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest scenario.MethodsThis pilot trial randomized in-hospital resuscitation teams of 4 to 6 participants to a plastic drape or without a drape in an in situ cardiopulmonary arrest simulation. The mannequin's airway emanated simulated virus particles (GloGerm, Moab, UT), detectable through UV light. Primary outcomes included airway management and CPR quality measures. Secondary outcomes included visible contamination on personal protective equipment (PPE). We used the Non-Technical Skills (NO-TECHS) instrument to measure perceived team performance and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) to measure individual workload. Outcome variables were analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with participant number as a covariate.ResultsSeven teams were allocated to the intervention (plastic drape) group and 7 to the control. Intubation and ventilation performance (& eta;(2) = 0.09, P > 0.3) and chest compression quality (& eta;(2) = 0.03-0.19, P > 0.14) were not affected by the plastic drape. However, mean contaminated PPE per person decreased with the drape (2.8 & PLUSMN; 0.3 vs. 3.7 & PLUSMN; 0.3, partial & eta;(2) = 0.29, P = 0.05). No differences in perceived workload nor team performance were noted (P > 0.09).ConclusionsIn this pilot study, the use of a plastic drape barrier seems not to affect resuscitation performance on simulated cardiopulmonary arrest but decreases health care worker contamination risk. Further implementation trials could characterize the true risk reduction and any effect on resuscitation outcomes.