Age and gender differences in maxillary canine impaction severity and orthodontic treatment difficulty-A retrospective cross-sectional study

被引:1
作者
Alsmnan, Abdullah [1 ]
Althunayyan, Abdulrahman [1 ]
Alshawy, Ebrahim [1 ]
Almotairy, Nabeel [1 ]
机构
[1] Qassim Univ, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Canine; Panoramic radiographs; Radiographic determinants; Linear and angular measurements; Adult; DURATION; POSITION; FEATURES; PREVALENCE; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSIS; CHILDREN; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.25259/APOS_18_2023
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to compare the maxillary canine impaction severity and orthodontic treatment difficulty in relation to age and gender.Material and Methods: Orthopantomograms of 105 patients with maxillary canine impaction were retrospectively collected and divided into 50 adolescents (11-17 years; 30% females) and 55 young adults (18-25 years; 34% females). Canine impaction severity was determined using one angular and three linear radiographic measurements, while orthodontic treatment difficulty was determined using a modified Pitt et al. index. Age and gender differences were assessed using Chi-square with Bonferroni correction and Mann-Whitney U-tests (P < 0.05), while the association between orthodontic treatment difficulty index score and age was assessed using linear regression analysis (95% confidence interval).Results: Compared to young adults, adolescents had mild (<30 & DEG;) canine long axis to midline angulation (P = 0.008) and distally positioned cusp tip of impacted canine relative to adjacent lateral incisor root (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, males compared to females had distally positioned cusp tip of impacted canine relative to adjacent lateral incisor root (P = 0.008), while females compared to males had the canine cusp tip mesial to lateral incisor root (P = 0.002). The orthodontic treatment difficulty trend increased with age (R2 = 0.077; P < 001) and was higher in young adults than adolescents (P = 0.0218).Conclusion: The severity of maxillary canine impaction was higher in young adults and, to a lesser extent, in females. Orthodontic treatment difficulty of impacted maxillary canines also increased with age but not gender.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 175
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Evaluation of impacted maxillary canine position using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography
    Alfaleh, Wafa
    Al Thobiani, Sarah
    [J]. SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2020, 33 (07) : 738 - 744
  • [2] Early prediction of maxillary canine impaction
    Alqerban, Ali
    Storms, Ann-Sophie
    Voet, Martine
    Fieuws, Steffen
    Willems, Guy
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (03)
  • [3] Baccetti T, 1998, ANGLE ORTHOD, V68, P267
  • [4] Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines
    Becker, A
    Chaushu, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 124 (05) : 509 - 514
  • [5] Maxillary tooth size variation in dentitions with palatal canine displacement
    Becker, A
    Sharabi, S
    Chaushu, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2002, 24 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [6] BECKER A, 1995, ANGLE ORTHOD, V65, P95
  • [7] Cone-beam computed tomography and the orthosurgical management of impacted teeth
    Becker, Adrian
    Chaushu, Stella
    Casap-Caspi, Nardy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 141 (10) : 14S - 18S
  • [8] An evaluation of factors affecting duration of orthodontic treatment
    Beckwith, FR
    Ackerman, RJ
    Cobb, CM
    Tira, DE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 115 (04) : 439 - 447
  • [9] A review of the diagnosis and management of impacted maxillary canines
    Bedoya, Marisela M.
    Park, Jae Hyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (12) : 1485 - 1493
  • [10] IMPACTED MAXILLARY CANINES - A REVIEW
    BISHARA, SE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 101 (02) : 159 - 171