A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Caries Prevention following the AGREE II Checklist

被引:2
|
作者
Lamloum, Demetrio [1 ,2 ]
Arghittu, Antonella [3 ]
Ferrara, Pietro [4 ,5 ]
Castiglia, Paolo [3 ]
Dettori, Marco [1 ,3 ]
Gaeta, Maddalena [2 ]
Odone, Anna [2 ]
Campus, Guglielmo [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Restorat Pediat & Prevent Dent, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Pavia, Dept Publ Hlth Expt & Forens Med, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Sassari, Dept Med Surg & Pharm, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, I-20126 Monza, Italy
[5] IRCCS Ist Auxol Italiano, I-20145 Milan, Italy
[6] Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Cariol, Chennai 600077, India
关键词
public health dentistry; evidence-based dentistry; guidelines; AGREE II; DENTAL-CARIES; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONSENSUS; FLUORIDE; QUALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare11131895
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Untreated oral diseases are detrimental to overall well-being and quality of life and are in close relationship with social and economic consequences. The presence of strong evidence for caries primary and secondary prevention is a compulsory tool for the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). This paper was aimed to assess systematically the importance of clinical practice guidelines in caries prevention management considering both the adult and pediatric populations and evaluate them using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Checklist. Records were extracted from EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline and seven other relevant guideline databases between 6 January and 14 February 2023. Two reviewers independently conducted the appraisal using the web-based platform My AGREE PLUS. Twenty-one guidelines/papers met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Eight CPGs included both primary and secondary prevention interventions, whereas thirteen presented a single preventive model. Overall, 12 guidelines were published in the USA. The mean AGREE II scores ranged from 35.4% to 84.3%. Of the total twenty-one included guidelines, twelve were classified as "Recommended", ranging from 56.3% to 84.3%, the others were described as "Recommended with modification", ranging from 35.4% to 68.9%. From the AGREE II analysis carried out, the CPGs included in this survey adopted a punctual methodological rigor but lacked applicative power. The present survey showed that the public, as the primary beneficiary, played a limited role in the development of the twenty-one CPGs. Hence, methodological improvement can better support high-quality CPG development in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The quality of clinical practice guidelines for preoperative care using the AGREE II instrument: a systematic review
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    Tapia-Lopez, Elena
    Virgilio, Sacha
    Bardach, Ariel
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [2] Review of clinical practice guidelines for postpartum hemorrhage according to AGREE II
    Zhang, Rongli
    Cao, Xiao
    Feng, Haoxue
    Liu, Ying
    Cui, Ping
    Jiang, Hui
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 121
  • [3] Biopsychosocial Model Domains in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Return to Sport After ACL Injury: Systematic Review Using the AGREE II Checklist
    Medeiros de Queiroz, Jeffeson Hildo
    Bandeira Murakawa, Yanka Aparecida
    de Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Leao Almeida, Gabriel Peixoto
    de Oliveira, Rodrigo Ribeiro
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (02): : 165 - 175
  • [4] Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument
    Castellini, G.
    Iannicelli, V.
    Briguglio, M.
    Corbetta, D.
    Sconfienza, L. M.
    Banfi, G.
    Gianola, S.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [5] Clinical practice guidelines in idiopathic facial paralysis: systematic review using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) instrument
    Luu, Neil N.
    Chorath, Kevin T.
    May, Brandon R.
    Bhuiyan, Nuvid
    Moreira, Alvaro G.
    Rajasekaran, Karthik
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 268 (05) : 1847 - 1856
  • [6] Clinical practice guidelines on newborn hearing screening: A systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument
    Chorath, Kevin
    Garza, Luis
    Tarriela, Aina
    Luu, Neil
    Rajasekaran, Karthik
    Moreira, Alvaro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [7] Clinical practice guidelines for the nutritional risk screening and assessment of cancer patients: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument
    Zhou, Hong-Juan
    Deng, Li-Jin
    Wang, Tao
    Chen, Jin-Xiu
    Jiang, Su-Zhen
    Yang, Liu
    Liu, Fang
    Weng, Mei-Hua
    Hu, Jing-Wen
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (06) : 2885 - 2893
  • [8] A quality assessment and systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on hormone replacement therapy for menopause using the AGREE II instrument
    Roman, Maria-Patricia
    Ciortea, Razvan
    Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
    Din, Roxana
    Malutan, Andrei Mihai
    Bucuri, Carmen Elena
    Caseriu, Elena-Alexandra
    Ormindean, Cristina Mihaela
    Nati, Ionel Daniel
    Suciu, Viorela-Elena
    Mihu, Dan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 303 : 294 - 301
  • [9] Dental caries prevention in children and adolescents: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines
    Seiffert, Andrea
    Zaror, Carlos
    Atala-Acevedo, Claudia
    Ormeno, Andrea
    Jose Martinez-Zapata, Maria
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (09) : 3129 - 3141
  • [10] Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of acne vulgaris: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument
    Sanclemente, Gloria
    Acosta, Jorge-Luis
    Tamayo, Maria-Eulalia
    Bonfill, Xavier
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 306 (03) : 269 - 277