Walled in: borderlands, frontiers and the future of archaeology

For archaeology to survive in the present and for critical discourse on the past to thrive, archaeologists must advocate for the discipline ' s continued relevancy. In this Debate article, the authors illustrate the potential and challenges of such advocacy by examining contemporary perceptions of the Roman period Hadrian ' s Wall and how it relates tomodern border landscapes-namely the US/Mexico border. They argue that archaeologists have not addressed the imagined continuity of socio-political narratives surrounding borderlands, calling for wider recognition of border materiality. The authors contend that the uncritical portrayal of the past, particularly in politically charged spaces such as border zones, can contribute to inequality and oppression in the present.