SQM2.20: Semiempirical quantum-mechanical scoring function yields DFT-quality protein-ligand binding affinity predictions in minutes

被引:20
作者
Pecina, Adam [1 ]
Fanfrlik, Jindrich [1 ]
Lepsik, Martin [1 ]
Rezac, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Acad Sci, Inst Organ Chem & Biochem, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
NDDO APPROXIMATIONS; FREE-ENERGIES; DOCKING; OPTIMIZATION; VALIDATION; MODEL; BENCHMARKING; PARAMETERS; DISPERSION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-024-45431-8
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Accurate estimation of protein-ligand binding affinity is the cornerstone of computer-aided drug design. We present a universal physics-based scoring function, named SQM2.20, addressing key terms of binding free energy using semiempirical quantum-mechanical computational methods. SQM2.20 incorporates the latest methodological advances while remaining computationally efficient even for systems with thousands of atoms. To validate it rigorously, we have compiled and made available the PL-REX benchmark dataset consisting of high-resolution crystal structures and reliable experimental affinities for ten diverse protein targets. Comparative assessments demonstrate that SQM2.20 outperforms other scoring methods and reaches a level of accuracy similar to much more expensive DFT calculations. In the PL-REX dataset, it achieves excellent correlation with experimental data (average R2 = 0.69) and exhibits consistent performance across all targets. In contrast to DFT, SQM2.20 provides affinity predictions in minutes, making it suitable for practical applications in hit identification or lead optimization. The paper presents the universal QM-based scoring function that accurately and rapidly predicts protein-ligand binding affinities, outperforming current computational tools. This is demonstrated on the PL-REX experimental benchmark dataset.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Multiscale methods in drug design bridge chemical and biological complexity in the search for cures [J].
Amaro, Rommie E. ;
Mulholland, Adrian J. .
NATURE REVIEWS CHEMISTRY, 2018, 2 (04)
[2]   Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein-Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity? [J].
Ballester, Pedro J. ;
Schreyer, Adrian ;
Blundell, Tom L. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2014, 54 (03) :944-955
[3]   A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking [J].
Ballester, Pedro J. ;
Mitchell, John B. O. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (09) :1169-1175
[4]  
Case D. A., 2022, Amber 2021
[5]  
Cavasotto CN, 2020, METHODS MOL BIOL, V2114, P257, DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0282-9_16
[6]   Understanding Conformational Entropy in Small Molecules [J].
Chan, Lucian ;
Morris, Garrett M. ;
Hutchison, Geoffrey R. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2021, 17 (04) :2099-2106
[7]   Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Method PM6-DH2X Describes the Geometry and Energetics of CK2-Inhibitor Complexes Involving Halogen Bonds Well, While the Empirical Potential Fails [J].
Dobes, Petr ;
Rezac, Jan ;
Fanfrlik, Jindrich ;
Otyepka, Michal ;
Hobza, Pavel .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2011, 115 (26) :8581-8589
[8]   BINANA: A novel algorithm for ligand-binding characterization [J].
Durrant, Jacob D. ;
McCammon, J. Andrew .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2011, 29 (06) :888-893
[9]   AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python']Python Bindings [J].
Eberhardt, Jerome ;
Santos-Martins, Diogo ;
Tillack, Andreas F. ;
Forli, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2021, 61 (08) :3891-3898
[10]   Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy [J].
Friesner, RA ;
Banks, JL ;
Murphy, RB ;
Halgren, TA ;
Klicic, JJ ;
Mainz, DT ;
Repasky, MP ;
Knoll, EH ;
Shelley, M ;
Perry, JK ;
Shaw, DE ;
Francis, P ;
Shenkin, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1739-1749