Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Efficacy of Deucravacitinib Versus Biologics and Nonbiologics for Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

被引:24
作者
Armstrong, April W. [1 ,8 ]
Warren, Richard B. [2 ,3 ]
Zhong, Yichen [4 ]
Zhuo, Joe [4 ]
Cichewicz, Allie [5 ]
Kadambi, Ananth [5 ]
Junqueira, Daniela [5 ]
Westley, Tracy [5 ,7 ]
Kisa, Renata [4 ]
Daamen, Carolin [4 ]
Augustin, Matthias [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Northern Care Alliance NHS Fdn Trust, Dermatol Ctr, Manchester, England
[3] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[4] Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA
[5] Evidera, Waltham, MA USA
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Inst Hlth Serv Res Dermatol & Nursing, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Lumanity, Sheffield, England
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Dept Med, Div Dermatol, 2001 St Mon Blvd,Suite 1090, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
关键词
Biologics; Deucravacitinib; Indirect treatment comparison; Network meta-analysis; Non-biologics; Psoriasis; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; INTERLEUKIN-12/23; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ORAL PHOSPHODIESTERASE-4 INHIBITOR; TO-SEVERE PSORIASIS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE-III; CHINESE PATIENTS; JAPANESE PATIENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s13555-023-01034-7
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
IntroductionDeucravacitinib, a newly approved oral medication for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, demonstrated efficacy versus apremilast and placebo in two phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) indirectly compared deucravacitinib with other relevant systemic biologic/nonbiologic treatments.MethodsOnline databases were searched for RCTs published through October 2021. Eligible studies were head-to-head comparisons between systemic therapies and/or placebo reporting 50%, 75%, 90%, or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Comparisons included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-23, and IL 12/23 inhibitors, and systemic nonbiologics. A multinomial Bayesian NMA was used to derive estimates of the relative efficacy of deucravacitinib and other systemic therapies. Response probabilities for each treatment and corresponding 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for achieving a PASI response were calculated over short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up (weeks 10-16, 24-28, and 44-60).ResultsThe NMA included 47 RCTs. Deucravacitinib showed the highest PASI 75 response rates among nonbiologic systemic therapies across time points. Deucravacitinib PASI 75 response rate (95% CrI) over short-term follow-up was 54.1% (46.5-61.6), within the range of first-generation biologics (etanercept, 39.7% [31.6-48.3]; infliximab, 79.0% [74.0-83.5]). At mid-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 increased to 63.3% (58.0-68.4). At long-term follow-up, deucravacitinib PASI 75 was 65.9% (58.0-73.4), comparable to first-generation biologics adalimumab (62.8%; 55.3-69.6) and ustekinumab (68.0%; 64.6-71.5).ConclusionsPatients receiving deucravacitinib were more likely to achieve PASI 75 response versus apremilast and methotrexate across all time points. The long-term PASI 75 response rate for deucravacitinib was similar to those of adalimumab and ustekinumab. The approval of deucravacitinib offers patients the choice of an oral therapy with long-term efficacy similar to that of some biologics.
引用
收藏
页码:2839 / 2857
页数:19
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]   Comparing the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a randomized double blind pilot study with a review of literature [J].
Almutairi, Nawaf ;
Eassa, Bayoumy .
POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2021, 38 (02) :281-288
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, HUM PACK INS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, BIMZ SUMM PROD CHAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NICE DSU TECHNICAL S
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, SIL PACK INS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2022, SOT PACK INS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, COS PACK INS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, REM PACK INS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2023, SKYR PACK INS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ENBR PACK INS