Anti-CGRP and Anti-CGRP Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prophylaxis: Retrospective Observational Study on 209 Patients

被引:0
作者
Schweiger, Vittorio [1 ]
Bellamoli, Paola [1 ]
Taus, Francesco [2 ]
Gottin, Leonardo [1 ]
Martini, Alvise [1 ]
Nizzero, Marta [1 ]
Bonora, Eleonora [1 ]
Del Balzo, Giovanna [3 ]
Donadello, Katia [1 ]
Secchettin, Erica [1 ]
Finco, Gabriele [4 ]
De Santis, Daniele [5 ]
Polati, Enrico [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Therapy Ctr, Dept Surg, I-37124 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Sect Stat, I-37124 Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Verona, Dept Diagnost & Publ Hlth, Sect Forens Med, I-37129 Verona, Italy
[4] Univ Cagliari, Dept Med Sci & Publ Hlth, I-09124 Cagliari, Italy
[5] Univ Verona, Head & Neck Dept, I-37129 Verona, Italy
关键词
migraine; prophylaxis; monoclonal antibodies; calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP); DISABILITY; MIDAS; SAFETY; HIT-6;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13041130
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with migraine and who were prescribed, between 2019 and 2022, subcutaneous injections of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) fremanezumab or galcanezumab or anti-CGRP receptors mAb erenumab regardless of the concomitant assumption of any other acute-phase or prophylactic migraine medication. Results: Regarding efficacy, in the 205 analyzed patients, the change from baseline in terms of MIDAS, HIT-6, MMDs and MAD scores was statistically significant for erenumab and galcanezumab, while for fremanezumab a statistical significance was not achieved likely due to the small sample size. In the treated population, 36 patients (17.5%) reported AEs (pain during injection, transient injection site erythema, nausea, constipation and fatigue). Only 5 patients (2.4%) discontinued the treatment for AEs while 15 patients (7.3%) left for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: this retrospective study comes out in favor of both significant efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptors mAbs in migraine patients. Further methodologically stronger studies are necessary to validate our observation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
    Piero Barbanti
    Cinzia Aurilia
    Gabriella Egeo
    Stefania Proietti
    Florindo D’Onofrio
    Paola Torelli
    Marco Aguggia
    Davide Bertuzzo
    Cinzia Finocchi
    Michele Trimboli
    Sabina Cevoli
    Giulia Fiorentini
    Bianca Orlando
    Maurizio Zucco
    Laura Di Clemente
    Ilaria Cetta
    Bruno Colombo
    Monica Laura Bandettini di Poggio
    Valentina Favoni
    Licia Grazzi
    Antonio Salerno
    Antonio Carnevale
    Micaela Robotti
    Fabio Frediani
    Claudia Altamura
    Massimo Filippi
    Fabrizio Vernieri
    Stefano Bonassi
    [J]. Journal of Neurology, 2024, 271 : 2434 - 2443
  • [32] A Popperian View on Anti-CGRP Biologics in Migraine
    Chiarugi, Alberto
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (10): : 1855 - 1860
  • [33] Antiseizure Medications for the Prophylaxis of Migraine during the Anti-CGRP Drugs Era
    Rollo, Eleonora
    Romozzi, Marina
    Vollono, Catello
    Calabresi, Paolo
    Geppetti, Pierangelo
    Iannone, Luigi F.
    [J]. CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 21 (08) : 1767 - 1785
  • [34] Monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies in post-menopausal women: a real-life study
    Simona, Guerzoni
    Carlo, Baraldi
    Daria, Brovia
    Michela, Cainazzo Maria
    Flavia, Lo Castro
    Luca, Pani
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2023, 123 (03) : 1039 - 1047
  • [35] Meta-regression to explain the placebo effects in clinical trials of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention
    Regnier, Stephane Alexandre
    Lee, Xin Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 1072 - 1080
  • [36] Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine in patients over 65 years: a systematic review
    Munoz-Vendrell, Albert
    Lopez-Bravo, Alba
    Layos-Romero, Almudena
    Alberola-Amores, Francisco J.
    Caballero, Maria Obdulia Lozano
    Sanchez-Soblechero, Antonio
    Morales-Hernandez, Cristian
    Castro-Sanchez, Maria Victoria
    Navarro-Perez, Maria Pilar
    Cordova-Infantes, Maria Rocio
    Caronna, Edoardo
    Irimia, Pablo
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Alicia
    Jr Headache Grp Spanish Soc Neurology jGECSEN
    [J]. PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2025, 15 (03) : 161 - 171
  • [37] The role of anti-CGRP antibodies in the pathophysiology of primary headaches
    Barbanti, Piero
    Aurilia, Cinzia
    Fofi, Luisa
    Egeo, Gabriella
    Ferroni, Patrizia
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 38 : S31 - S35
  • [38] In Response to Recommendations on the Use of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Children and Adolescents
    Charles, James A.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (01): : 271 - 272
  • [39] Could the New Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Be Effective in Migraine Aura? Case Reports and Literature Review
    Albanese, Maria
    Mercuri, Nicola Biagio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [40] Treatment and management of migraine in neurological ambulatory practice in Poland by indicating therapy with monoclonal anti-CGRP antibodies
    Domitrz, Izabela
    Lipa, Aurelia
    Rozniecki, Jacek
    Stepien, Adam
    Kozubski, Wojciech
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2020, 54 (04) : 337 - 343