Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI in Selecting Men With Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer for Focal Ablative Therapies

被引:5
作者
Dias, Adriano Basso [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ghai, Sangeet [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ortega, Claudia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Perlis, Nathan [2 ,5 ]
Berlin, Alejandro [2 ,4 ,6 ]
Avery, Lisa [7 ]
Veit-Haibach, Patrick [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus [8 ]
Metser, Ur [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Imaging Toronto, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Womens Coll Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Hlth Network, Lab Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Imaging, 610 Univ Ave,Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
关键词
focal therapy; PET/MRI; prostate cancer; PSMA; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000004819
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of multiparametric (mp) MRI to F-18-DCFPyL PET/MRI for detecting clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) in men with low-/intermediate-risk PCa being considered for focal ablative therapy (FT), using 2 interpretation schemes, and to assess the rate of exclusion from FT for each modality. Methods: This prospective study evaluated men with low- or intermediate-risk PCa, potential candidates for FT based on initial biopsy as per institutional protocol, who underwent F-18-DCFPyL PET/MRI. Each modality (mpMRI, PET/MRI using PROMISE classification [PET/MRI PROMISE], and PET/ MRI considering any focal lesion on PET as positive [PETFL/MRI]) was assessed independently. All suspicious lesions underwent PET/MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsies. Diagnostic performances were calculated and compared using the exact binomial test on paired proportions. Results: Thirty-four men (median age, 64 years; interquartile range, 60-70 years) were included. Overall, 40 of 67 lesions (60%) identified on mpMRI and/or PET/MRI were malignant, and 34 of 40 lesions (85%) were csPCa (>= 6 mm ISUP [International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group] GG1 or ISUP-GG >= 2). On lesion-level analysis, for detecting csPCa, sensitivity appeared higher for PETFL/MRI than mpMRI and PET/MRI PROMISE (97% vs 76% and 79%, respectively [P = 0.02 and 0.03]), whereas specificity was lower (30% vs 85% and 88%, respectively [P < 0.001]). The calculated overall accuracy rates for PETFL/MRI,mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE were 64%, 81%, and 84%, respectively. PETFL/MRI, mpMRI, and PET/MRI PROMISE excluded 10 of 34 (29%), 7 of 34 (21%), and 6 of 34 (18%) men from FT, respectively. Conclusions: F-18-DCFPyL PET/MRI excluded nearly 30% of patients with low-/intermediate-risk PCa from FT, with a potential role in decreasing selection failure. Compared with mpMRI, PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity for detecting csPCa in men who were candidates for FT.
引用
收藏
页码:E462 / E467
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Modelling binary data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]   [18F]-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Localization of Dominant Intraprostatic Foci: First Experience [J].
Bauman, Glenn ;
Martin, Peter ;
Thiessen, Jonathan D. ;
Taylor, Reggie ;
Moussa, Madeleine ;
Gaed, Mena ;
Rachinsky, Irina ;
Kassam, Zahra ;
Chin, Joseph ;
Pautler, Stephen ;
Lee, Ting Yim ;
Valliant, John F. ;
Ward, Aaron .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05) :702-706
[5]   Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [18F]DCFPyL PET/MRI compared to multiparametric MRI: a comparison with the histopathology in the radical prostatectomy specimen, the ProStaPET study [J].
Bodar, Yves J. L. ;
Zwezerijnen, Ben G. J. C. ;
van der Voorn, Patrick J. ;
Jansen, Bernard H. E. ;
Smit, Ruth S. ;
Kol, Sabrine Q. ;
Meijer, Dennie ;
de Bie, Katelijne ;
Yaqub, Maqsood ;
Windhorst, Bert A. D. ;
Hendrikse, Harry N. H. ;
Vis, Andre N. ;
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (05) :1731-1742
[6]   Impact of 18F-DCFPyL PET on Staging and Treatment of Unfavorable Intermediate or High-Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Dias, Adriano Basso ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Bauman, Glenn ;
Veit-Haibach, Patrick ;
Berlin, Alejandro ;
Ortega, Claudia ;
Avery, Lisa ;
Metser, Ur .
RADIOLOGY, 2022, 304 (03) :600-608
[7]   MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study [J].
Ehdaie, Behfar ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Holland, Ford ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Kibel, Adam S. ;
Trinh, Quoc-Dien ;
Durack, Jeremy C. ;
Akin, Oguz ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Sperling, Dan ;
Wong, Jeffrey Y. C. ;
Yuh, Bertram ;
Woodrum, David A. ;
Mynderse, Lance A. ;
Raman, Steven S. ;
Pantuck, Allan J. ;
Schiffman, Marc H. ;
McClure, Timothy D. ;
Sonn, Geoffrey A. ;
Ghanouni, Pejman .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 (07) :910-918
[8]   Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT [J].
Eiber, Matthias ;
Herrmann, Ken ;
Calais, Jeremie ;
Hadaschik, Boris ;
Giesel, Frederik L. ;
Hartenbach, Markus ;
Hope, Thomas ;
Reiter, Robert ;
Maurer, Tobias ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Fendler, Wolfgang P. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (03) :469-478
[9]   The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study [J].
Emmett, Louise ;
Buteau, James ;
Papa, Nathan ;
Moon, Daniel ;
Thompson, James ;
Roberts, Matthew J. ;
Rasiah, Kris ;
Pattison, David A. ;
Yaxley, John ;
Thomas, Paul ;
Hutton, Anthony C. ;
Agrawal, Shikha ;
Amin, Amer ;
Blazevski, Alexandar ;
Chalasani, Venu ;
Ho, Bao ;
Nguyen, Andrew ;
Liu, Victor ;
Lee, Jonathan ;
Sheehan-Dare, Gemma ;
Kooner, Raji ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Chan, Lyn ;
Cusick, Thomas ;
Namdarian, Benjamin ;
Kapoor, Jada ;
Alghazo, Omar ;
Woo, Henry H. ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Murphy, Declan ;
Hofman, Michael S. ;
Stricker, Phillip .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (06) :682-689
[10]   Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial [J].
Fendler, Wolfgang P. ;
Calais, Jeremie ;
Eiber, Matthias ;
Flavell, Robert R. ;
Mishoe, Ashley ;
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Nguyen, Hao G. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Rettig, Matthew B. ;
Okamoto, Shozo ;
Emmett, Louise ;
Zacho, Helle D. ;
Ilhan, Harun ;
Wetter, Axel ;
Rischpler, Christoph ;
Schoder, Heiko ;
Burger, Irene A. ;
Gartmann, Jeannine ;
Smith, Raven ;
Small, Eric J. ;
Slavik, Roger ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Herrmann, Ken ;
Czernin, Johannes ;
Hope, Thomas A. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (06) :856-863