Correlation between patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy and 2D dose image features

被引:4
作者
Guo, Yixiao [1 ]
Hu, Jinyan [2 ]
Li, Yang [3 ]
Ran, Juntao [4 ]
Cai, Hongyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Longhua Dist People's Hosp, Dept Oncol, Shenzhen 518109, Peoples R China
[3] Weifang People's Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Weifang 261000, Peoples R China
[4] First Hosp Lanzhou Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
关键词
STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; IMRT VERIFICATION; GAMMA INDEX; RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; DELIVERY; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-30719-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In radiotherapy, air-filled ion chamber detectors are ubiquitously used in routine dose measurements for treatment planning. However, its use has been restricted by intrinsic low spatial resolution barriers. We developed one procedure for patient-specific quality assurance (QA) in arc radiotherapy by coalescing two adjacent measurement images into a single image to improve spatial resolution and sampling frequency, and investigated how different spatial resolutions affect the QA results. PTW 729 and 1500 ion chamber detectors were used for dosimetric verification via coalescing two measurements with 5 mm-couch shift and the isocenter, and only isocenter measurement, which we call coalescence and standard acquisition (SA). Statistical process control (SPC), process capability analysis (PCA), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to compare the performance of the two procedures in determining tolerance levels and identifying clinically relevant errors. By analyzing 1256 gamma values calculated on interpolated data points, our results indicated that detector 1500 showed higher averages in coalescence cohorts at different tolerance criteria and the dispersion degrees were spread out smaller. Detector 729 yielded a slightly lower process capability of 0.79, 0.76, 1.10, and 1.34, but detector 1500 exhibited somewhat different results of 0.94, 1.42, 1.19, and 1.60 in magnitude. The results of SPC individual control chart showed that cases in coalescence cohorts with gamma values lowering its lower control limit (LCL) were greater than those in SA cohorts for detector 1500. A combination of the width of multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf, the cross-sectional area of the single detector, and the spacing between adjacent detectors might lead to discrepancies in percent gamma values across diverse spatial resolution scenarios. The accuracy of reconstructed volume dose is mainly determined by the interpolation algorithm used in dosimetric systems. The magnitude of filling factor in the ion chamber detectors determined its ability to detect dose deviations. SPC and PCA results indicated that coalescence procedure could detect more potential failure QA results than SA while enhancing action thresholds.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Changes in Patterns of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Verification and Quality Assurance in the UK [J].
Abolaban, F. ;
Zaman, S. ;
Cashmore, J. ;
Nisbet, A. ;
Clark, C. H. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (08) :E28-E34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 83 ICRU, DOI 10.1093/jicrundq002
[3]   Quasi 3D dosimetry (EPID, conventional 2D/3D detector matrices) [J].
Back, A. .
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2015, 573
[4]   Statistical variability and confidence intervals for planar dose QA pass rates [J].
Bailey, Daniel W. ;
Nelms, Benjamin E. ;
Attwood, Kristopher ;
Kumaraswamy, Lalith ;
Podgorsak, Matthew B. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (11) :6053-6064
[5]   Plan delivery quality assurance for CyberKnife: Statistical process control analysis of 350 film-based patient-specific QAs [J].
Bellec, J. ;
Delaby, N. ;
Jouyaux, F. ;
Perdrieux, M. ;
Bouvier, J. ;
Sorel, S. ;
Henry, O. ;
Lafond, C. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 39 :50-58
[6]   A quantification of the effectiveness of EPID dosimetry and software-based plan verification systems in detecting incidents in radiotherapy [J].
Bojechko, Casey ;
Phillps, Mark ;
Kalet, Alan ;
Ford, Eric C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) :5363-5369
[7]   Detector dose response in megavoltage small photon beams. I. Theoretical concepts [J].
Bouchard, Hugo ;
Seuntjens, Jan ;
Duane, Simon ;
Kamio, Yuji ;
Palmans, Hugo .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (10) :6033-6047
[8]   Statistical process control for IMRT dosimetric verification [J].
Breen, Stephen L. ;
Moseley, Douglas J. ;
Zhang, Beibei ;
Sharpe, Michael B. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) :4417-4425
[9]   How the detector resolution affects the clinical significance of SBRT pre-treatment quality assurance results [J].
Bruschi, A. ;
Esposito, M. ;
Pini, S. ;
Ghirelli, A. ;
Zatelli, G. ;
Russo, S. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 49 :129-134
[10]   ROC analysis in patient specific quality assurance [J].
Carlone, Marco ;
Cruje, Charmainne ;
Rangel, Alejandra ;
McCabe, Ryan ;
Nielsen, Michelle ;
MacPherson, Miller .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (04)