Conducting Qualitative Research in Organizations Ethically: Organizationality as a Heuristic to Identify Ethical Challenges

被引:0
作者
Scheytt, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Pflueger, Jessica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Sociol, Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Sociol, Universitatsstr 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
research ethics; qualitative research; interviewing; organization studies; management studies; employment relations; REFLEXIVITY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1177/16094069241237548
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The consideration of research ethics to protect the research participants is a central element of empirical social research. Empirical research in organizations has certain characteristics: the research field is organized hierarchically and characterized by formal membership, specific control mechanisms, positive and negative sanctions, etc. Drawing on existing literature, we use the concept of "organizationality" to argue the characteristics of organizations lead to specific ethical challenges, for example dealing with layered field accesses, power asymmetries, and potentially strong sanctions. These challenges make it difficult to ensure confidentiality and non-maleficence and protect participants from risks. We present ethical challenges that typically arise at critical stages of the qualitative research process (planning, field access, the field, data storage, publication, and data archiving). This paper offers a heuristic to identify ethical challenges in qualitative organizational research. It extends the debate on research ethics in qualitative social research to organizational contexts, thereby bringing into focus the structural dimensions of harm.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Ahrne G., 2019, Organization outside Organizations: The Abundance of Partial Organization in Social Life
[2]   Organization outside organizations: the significance of partial organization [J].
Ahrne, Goran ;
Brunsson, Nils .
ORGANIZATION, 2011, 18 (01) :83-104
[3]   Confronting the Digital: Doing Ethnography in Modern Organizational Settings [J].
Akemu, Onajomo ;
Abdelnour, Samer .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 23 (02) :296-321
[4]  
Allmark P.J., 2009, RES ETHICS REV, V5, P48, DOI DOI 10.1177/174701610900500203
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Code of Ethics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Statement of Ethical Practice
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, RatSWD Output, V9, P25, DOI DOI 10.17620/02671.1
[8]   Organizational Society Revisited: from Archetype to New Forms of Organization [J].
Arnold, Nadine ;
Hasse, Raimund ;
Mormann, Hannah .
KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2021, 73 (03) :339-360
[9]   Why are social scientists still reluctant to embrace email as data? An ethnographic examination of interactions within virtual teams [J].
Au, Yee Wei ;
Marks, Abigail .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2013, 27 (05) :880-890
[10]  
Baez B., 2002, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V2, P35, DOI DOI 10.1177/1468794102002001638