Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance

被引:8
作者
Makhlouf, Shorouk [1 ,2 ]
Quinn, Cecily [3 ,4 ]
Toss, Michael [1 ,5 ]
Alsaleem, Mansour [1 ,6 ]
Atallah, Nehal M. [1 ,7 ]
Ibrahim, Asmaa [1 ]
Rutland, Catrin S. [8 ]
Mongan, Nigel P. [9 ,10 ]
Rakha, Emad A. [1 ,11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Acad Unit Translat Med Sci, Nottingham, England
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Assiut, Egypt
[3] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Irish Natl Breast Screening Programme, Dublin, Ireland
[4] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Dublin, Ireland
[5] NHS Trust, Sheffield Teaching Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Sheffield, England
[6] Qassim Univ, Appl Coll, Unit Sci Res, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
[7] Menoufia Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Menoufia, Egypt
[8] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Nottingham, England
[9] Univ Nottingham, Sch Vet Med & Sci, Biodiscovery Inst, Nottingham, England
[10] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pharmacol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[11] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Histopathol, Nottingham, England
[12] Hamad Med Corp, Dept Pathol, Doha, Qatar
[13] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Dept Histopathol, Acad Unit Translat Med Sci, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[14] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hosp, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
关键词
Breast cancer; Oestrogen receptor; Heterogenous expression; Endocrine therapy; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; GENE-EXPRESSION; ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN; HORMONE-RECEPTORS; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; KI67; EXPRESSION; ER-POSITIVITY; HETEROGENEITY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113473
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular consequences of ER heterogeneity with respect to ET-response.Methods: ER expression, categorised by percentage and staining intensity in a large BC cohort (n = 7559) was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient ET response. The Cancer Genome Atlas Data BC cohort (n = 1047) was stratified by ER expression and transcriptomic analysis completed to better understand the molecular basis of ER heterogeneity.Results: The quantitative proportional increase in ER expression was positively associated with favourable prognostic parameters. Tumours with 1-9% ER expression were characteristically similar to ER-negative (<1%) tumours. Maximum ET-response was observed in tumours with 100% ER expression, with responses significantly different to tumours exhibiting ER at < 100% and significantly decreased survival rates were observed in tumours with 50% and 10% of ER expression. The Histochemical-score (H-score), which considers both staining intensity and percentage, added significant prognostic value over ER percentage alone with significant outcome differences observed at H-scores of 30, 100 and 200. There was a positive correlation between ER expression and ESR1 mRNA expression and expression of ER-regulated genes. Pathway analysis identified differential expression in key cancer-related pathways in different ER-positive groups.Conclusion: ET-response is statistically proportionally related to ER expression with significant differences observed at 10%, 50% and 100%. The H-score adds prognostic and predictive information.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Gene expression signature of estrogen receptor α status in breast cancer -: art. no. 37 [J].
Abba, MC ;
Hu, YH ;
Sun, HX ;
Drake, JA ;
Gaddis, S ;
Baggerly, K ;
Sahin, A ;
Aldaz, CM .
BMC GENOMICS, 2005, 6 (1)
[2]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[3]   Impact of intratumoural heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 expression in breast cancer [J].
Aleskandarany, M. A. ;
Green, A. R. ;
Ashankyty, I. ;
Elmouna, A. ;
Diez-Rodriguez, M. ;
Nolan, C. C. ;
Ellis, I. O. ;
Rakha, E. A. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (02) :287-295
[4]   MIB1/Ki-67 labelling index can classify grade 2 breast cancer into two clinically distinct subgroups [J].
Aleskandarany, Mohammed A. ;
Rakha, Emad A. ;
Macmillan, R. Douglas ;
Powe, Desmond G. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Green, Andrew R. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 127 (03) :591-599
[5]  
Allison K.H., 2020, ESTROGEN PROGESTERON
[6]   Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Dowsett, Mitchell ;
McKernin, Shannon E. ;
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Fitzgibbons, Patrick L. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Lakhani, Sunil R. ;
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana ;
Perlmutter, Jane ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Rimm, David L. ;
Symmans, W. Fraser ;
Torlakovic, Emina E. ;
Varella, Leticia ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Weisberg, Tracey F. ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) :1346-+
[7]  
Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
[8]   Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: Comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory [J].
Badve, Sunil S. ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Gray, Robert P. ;
Childs, Barrett H. ;
Maddala, Tara ;
Liu, Mei-Lan ;
Rowley, Steve C. ;
Shak, Steven ;
Perez, Edith D. ;
Shulman, Lawrence J. ;
Martino, Silvana ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Sledge, George W. ;
Goldstein, Lori J. ;
Sparano, Joseph A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15) :2473-2481
[9]   Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor As Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Endocrine Therapy: A Prospectively Powered Pathology Study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational Trial [J].
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Brookes, Cassandra L. ;
Robson, Tammy ;
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. ;
Billingham, Lucinda J. ;
Campbell, Fiona M. ;
Grant, Margaret ;
Hasenburg, Annette ;
Hille, Elysee T. M. ;
Kay, Charlene ;
Kieback, Dirk G. ;
Putter, Hein ;
Markopoulos, Christos ;
Kranenbarg, Elma Meershoek-Klein ;
Mallon, Elizabeth A. ;
Dirix, Luc ;
Seynaeve, Caroline ;
Rea, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (12) :1531-1538
[10]  
Bliss J., 2017, Evaluation of the tolerability of FE50C versus FE75C in a prospective randomised trial in adjuvant breast cancer patients, V2002, pA2017