Trends of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
McCormick, Carter D. [1 ,5 ]
Sullivan, Patrick S. [2 ]
Qato, Dima M. [3 ,4 ]
Crawford, Stephanie Y. [1 ]
Schumock, Glen T. [1 ]
Lee, Todd A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Syst Outcomes & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Titus Family Dept Clin Pharm, Program Med & Publ Hlth, Sch Pharm, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif Angeles, USC Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] UIC Coll Pharm, 833S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
claims analysis; HIV; nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis; postexposure prophylaxis; trend analysis; HIV PREEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS; TENOFOVIR DF; RISK; PREVENTION; HEALTH; BOSTON; PREP; PEP; EMTRICITABINE; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1097/QAD.0000000000003701
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe national annual rates of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) in the United States.Design: Retrospective cohort study of commercially insured individuals in the Merative MarketScan Database from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019.Methods: Patients at least 13 years old prescribed nPEP per recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines were identified using pharmacy claims. Rates of use were described overall and stratified by sex, age group, and region. These rates were qualitatively compared to the diagnosis rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) observed in the data. Joinpoint analysis identified inflection points of nPEP use.Results: Eleven thousand, three hundred and ninety-seven nPEP users were identified, with a mean age of 33.7 years. Most were males (64.6%) and lived in the south (33.2%) and northeast (32.4%). The rate of nPEP use increased 515%, from 1.42 nPEP users per 100 000 enrollees in 2010 to 8.71 nPEP users per 10 000 enrollees in 2019. The comparative nPEP use rates among subgroups largely mirrored their HIV diagnosis rates, that is, subgroups with a higher HIV rate had higher nPEP use. In the Joinpoint analysis significant growth was observed from 2012 to 2015 [estimated annual percentage change (EAPC): 45.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 29.4 - 64.3] followed by a more moderate increase from 2015 to 2019 (EAPC 16.0%; 95% CI: 12.6-19.6).Conclusions: nPEP use increased from 2010 to 2019, but not equally across all risk groups. Further policy interventions should be developed to reduce barriers and ensure adequate access to this important HIV prevention tool.
引用
收藏
页码:2223 / 2232
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Longitudinal Trends in HIV Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis Use at a Boston Community Health Center Between 1997 and 2013
    Jain, Sachin
    Oldenburg, Catherine E.
    Mimiaga, Matthew J.
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2015, 68 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [2] Updates on HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis
    Koyama, Atsuko
    Middlebrooks, Lauren
    Bullock, Adam
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 31 (04) : 454 - 461
  • [3] Patient Attrition Between the Emergency Department and Clinic Among Individuals Presenting for HIV Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis
    Bogoch, Isaac I.
    Scully, Eileen P.
    Zachary, Kimon C.
    Yawetz, Sigal
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    Bell, Chaim M.
    Andrews, Jason R.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 58 (11) : 1618 - 1624
  • [4] Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis: An Essential Tool for HIV Prevention
    Yankellow, Irene
    Yingling, Charles T.
    JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2019, 15 (10): : 764 - 771
  • [5] Canadian guideline on HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis
    Tan, Darrell H. S.
    Hull, Mark W.
    Yoong, Deborah
    Tremblay, Cecile
    O'Byrne, Patrick
    Thomas, Rejean
    Kille, Julie
    Baril, Jean-Guy
    Cox, Joseph
    Giguere, Pierre
    Harris, Marianne
    Hughes, Christine
    MacPherson, Paul
    O'Donnell, Shannon
    Reimer, Joss
    Singh, Ameeta
    Barrett, Lisa
    Bogoch, Isaac
    Jollimore, Jody
    Lambert, Gilles
    Lebouche, Bertrand
    Metz, Gila
    Rogers, Tim
    Shafran, Stephen
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (47) : E1448 - E1458
  • [6] Nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis, subsequent risk behaviour and HIV incidence in a cohort of Australian homosexual men
    Poynten, I. Mary
    Jin, Fengyi
    Mao, Limin
    Prestage, Garrett P.
    Kippax, Susan C.
    Kaldor, John M.
    Imrie, John
    Grulich, Andrew E.
    AIDS, 2009, 23 (09) : 1119 - 1126
  • [7] Survey of nonoccupational HIV postexposure prophylaxis in hospital emergency departments
    Kunches, LM
    Meehan, TM
    Boutwell, RC
    McGuire, JF
    JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2001, 26 (03) : 263 - 265
  • [8] Postexposure Prophylaxis Considerations for Occupational and Nonoccupational Exposures
    Kania, Deanna S.
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2007, 29 (01) : 20 - 32
  • [9] The public health impact of widespread availability of nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis against HIV
    Poynten, I. M.
    Smith, D. E.
    Cooper, D. A.
    Kaldor, J. M.
    Grulich, A. E.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (06) : 374 - 381
  • [10] HIV nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis for sexual assault cases: a 3-year investigation
    Shipeolu, Lolade
    Sampsel, Kari
    Reeves, Allegra
    Blaskovits, Farriss
    Heimerl, Melissa
    Muldoon, Katherine
    AIDS, 2020, 34 (06) : 869 - 876