Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Well-being Numerical Rating Scales

被引:2
作者
Luo, Qing [1 ]
Liu, Chunqin [1 ]
Zhou, Ying [1 ]
Zou, Xiaofang [2 ]
Song, Liqin [1 ]
Wang, Zihan [1 ]
Feng, Xue [1 ]
Tan, Wenying [1 ]
Chen, Jiani [1 ]
Smith, Graeme D. [3 ]
Chiesi, Francesca [4 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Caritas Inst Higher Educ, Sch Hlth Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug & Childs Hlth NEUROFARB, Florence, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
well-being; translation; psychometric evaluation; reliability; validity; item response theory; classical test theory; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; MENTAL-HEALTH; STRATEGIES; NUMBER;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1208001
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: Well-being is a multi-domain concept that involves measuring physical, psychological, social, and spiritual domains. However, there are currently few multi-domain and comprehensive well-being instruments available. In addition, measures that do exist customarily contain a vast number of items that may lead to boredom or fatigue in participants. The Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs) offer a concise, multi-domain well-being scale. This study aimed to perform the translation, adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of WB-NRSs (WBNRSs-CV).Methods: A total of 639 clinical participants and 542 community participants completed the WB-NRSs-CV, the Single-item Self-report Subjective Well-being Scale (SISRSWBS), the World Health Organization Five-item Well-Being Index (WHO-5), the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10).Results: High internal consistency and test-retest reliability were obtained for both samples. Additionally, WB-NRSs-CV was positively associated with SISRSWBS and WHO-5 and negatively associated with PSS-10 and K10. In the item response theory analysis, the model fit was adequate with the discrimination parameters ranging from 2.73 to 3.56. The diffculty parameters ranged from -3.40 to 1.71 and were evenly spaced along the trait, attesting to the appropriateness of the response categories. The invariance tests demonstrated that there was no difference in WB-NRSs-CV across groups by gender or age.Discussion: The WB-NRSs-CV was translated appropriately and cross-culturally adapted in China. It can be used as a rapid and relevant instrument to assess well-being in both clinical and non-clinical settings, with its utility for well-being measurement and management among the Chinese people.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, World Health Statistics 2015
  • [2] Baker F., 2001, BASIC ITEM RESPONSE
  • [3] Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-Five well-being scale
    Bech, P
    Olsen, LR
    Kjoller, M
    Rasmussen, NK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [4] Rapid and sound assessment of well-being within a multi-dimensional approach: The Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs)
    Bonacchi, Andrea
    Chiesi, Francesca
    Lau, Chloe
    Marunic, Georgia
    Saklofske, Donald H.
    Marra, Fabio
    Miccinesi, Guido
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [5] Brislin R.W., 1980, HDB CROSS CULTURAL P, P389
  • [6] Cai L., 2014, Technical Report
  • [7] Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Comment
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Lundy, J. Jason
    Hays, Ron D.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (05) : 648 - 662
  • [8] SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS
    CATTELL, RB
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) : 245 - 276
  • [9] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [10] A GLOBAL MEASURE OF PERCEIVED STRESS
    COHEN, S
    KAMARCK, T
    MERMELSTEIN, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1983, 24 (04) : 385 - 396