Evaluation of Shear Strength Prediction on Steel Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams Using Simple Strut-and-Tie Model

被引:2
作者
Yao, Gangfeng [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Xinjiang [2 ]
Xiong, Xueyu [3 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Struct Engn Jiangsu Prov, Suzhou 215011, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Suzhou 215011, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Dept Struct Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Steel reinforced concrete; Deep beam; Shear strength; Simple strut-and-tie model; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; TESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-023-08521-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, a practical method was proposed to predict the shear capacity of steel reinforced concrete (SRC) deep beams based on the simple strut-and-tie model (STM) for ordinary reinforced concrete (RC) members. Two alternatives were provided to consider the effect of encased steel shape. For Alternative 1, the SRC member is divided into two parts: the RC part and steel shape with inner concrete. The contribution of RC part is determined by the simple STM method, while that of steel shape is calculated with a proposed model from available literature. Alternative 2 directly considers the contribution of steel flanges and web to the ultimate strength of struts and tie of the STM. Totally 48 SRC deep beams were collected to evaluate the proposed method as well as the empirical methods from design codes. The results calculated by the selected code methods are overly conservative. The average test-to-predicted shear strength ratio of code methods ranges from 1.66 to 1.68, and the strengths of at most 2.1% of the specimens are overestimated. The prediction performance of Alternative 1 is close to code methods, with an average test-to-predicted shear strength ratio of 1.59. All the predicted results by Alternative 1 are higher than experimental results. Meanwhile, Alternative 2 provides the most accurate prediction with an average test-to-predicted shear strength ratio of 1.35 and an unsafe prediction ratio of 6.3%. Compared to code methods, the prediction accuracy of Alternative 2 is increased by 14% approximately. Furthermore, the influences of considered failure cases and width of horizontal strut for the STM of Alternative 2 were discussed in depth and the design recommendation was put forward.
引用
收藏
页码:13261 / 13275
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ACI (American Concrete Institute), 2019, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, JGJ 138-2016
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
[4]   Design Approach to Determine Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams Shear Strengthened with NSM Systems [J].
Baghi, Hadi ;
Barros, Joaquim A. O. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (08)
[5]  
Bentz EC, 2006, ACI STRUCT J, V103, P614
[6]  
BS EN 1994-1-1, 2004, 199411 BS EN, P2004
[7]  
Che SL, 2008, Research on basic behaviors and design theory of steel reinforced high strength and high performance concrete beams
[8]  
Chen CC., 2000, J CHIN I CIV HYDRAUL, V12, P511
[9]   Behavior and shear strength of steel shape reinforced concrete deep beams [J].
Chen, Cheng-Cheng ;
Lin, Keng-Ta ;
Chen, Yu-Jen .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 175 :425-435
[10]   Behavior and strength of steel reinforced concrete beam-column joints with two-side force inputs [J].
Chen, Cheng-Cheng ;
Lin, Keng-Ta .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2009, 65 (03) :641-649