Response surface methodology and artificial neural network-genetic algorithm for modeling and optimization of bioenergy production from biochar-improved anaerobic digestion

被引:18
|
作者
Zhan, Yuanhang [1 ]
Zhu, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Biochar addition; Carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; Total solids; Box-Behnken design; Methane yield; Optimal conditions; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; POULTRY LITTER; CO-DIGESTION; AMMONIA INHIBITION; METHANE PRODUCTION; ANIMAL WASTE; WHEAT-STRAW; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122336
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biochar can be used to improve the anaerobic digestion (AD) of agricultural wastes for higher methane production. However, the interaction of biochar addition with other factors of the anaerobic co-digestion (Co-AD) process has rarely been investigated. In this study, process models based on response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) were compared in modeling the methane yield (MY, mL CH4/g VS (added)) from the Co-AD of poultry litter and wheat straw with biochar addition. Box-Behnken design was applied, with the controlling parameters being carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N), total solids (TS, %), and biochar addition (Biochar, % TS). Numerical optimization and genetic algorithm (GA) were used as optimization tools for RSM and ANN, respectively. A significant second-order quadratic model was built by RSM (R-2 = 0.9981 and RMSE = 0.91), which demonstrated significant interactions between C/N and TS (p < 0.0001), and between C/N and Biochar (p < 0.05). The trained ANN (3-3-1) was less accurate (R-2 = 0.9926, RMSE = 1.80) compared to RSM. The optimization results by RSM and ANN coupled with GA (ANN-GA) were both validated with prediction errors <0.5%. The optimization results by ANN-GA should be used since it generated a higher maximum MY of 290.7 +/- 0.2 mL CH4/g VS (added), under the optimal conditions of C/N ratio 24.46, TS 5.03%, and Biochar 8.73% TS, showing an improvement of 20.6% (compared to the control) through process optimization. The methods can also be applied in other scenarios for process modeling and optimization. The optimized results could support real applications of using additives including biochar, active carbon, nanoparticles, etc., to promote the bioenergy production from AD of agricultural wastes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling and optimization of Hg2+ ion biosorption by live yeast Yarrowia lipolytica 70562 from aqueous solutions under artificial neural network-genetic algorithm and response surface methodology: kinetic and equilibrium study
    Dil, Ebrahim Alipanahpour
    Ghaedi, Mehrorang
    Ghezelbash, Gholam Reza
    Asfaram, Arash
    Ghaedi, Abdol Mohammad
    Mehrabi, Fatemeh
    RSC ADVANCES, 2016, 6 (59) : 54149 - 54161
  • [32] Prediction of biochar characteristics and optimization of pyrolysis process by response surface methodology combined with artificial neural network
    Xie, Haiwei
    Zhou, Xuan
    Zhang, Yan
    Yan, Wentao
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2025, 15 (03) : 4745 - 4757
  • [33] Composite structural optimization by genetic algorithm and neural network response surface modeling
    Xu, Y.-M. (xuymg@sina.com), 2005, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics (18):
  • [34] Optimization of fermentative hydrogen production process using genetic algorithm based on neural network and response surface methodology
    Wang, Jianlong
    Wan, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 255 - 261
  • [35] Modeling and Optimization of Triticale Wort Production Using an Artificial Neural Network and a Genetic Algorithm
    Pribic, Milana
    Kamenko, Ilija
    Despotovic, Sasa
    Mirosavljevic, Milan
    Pejin, Jelena
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [36] Modeling and optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm
    Abu Qdais, H.
    Hani, K. Bani
    Shatnawi, N.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (06) : 359 - 363
  • [37] Machine learning-based predictive modeling and optimization: Artificial neural network-genetic algorithm vs. response surface methodology for black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) farm waste fermentation
    Okoro, Oseweuba Valentine
    Hippolyte, D. E. Caevel
    Nie, Lei
    Karimi, Keikhosro
    Denayer, Joeri F. M.
    Shavandi, Armin
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2025, 218
  • [38] Optimization of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production by Azohydromonas lata MTCC 2311 by using genetic algorithm based on artificial neural network and response surface methodology
    Zafar, Mohd.
    Kumar, Shashi
    Kumar, Surendra
    Dhiman, Amit K.
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 1 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [39] Optimization of an artificial neural network topology using coupled response surface methodology and genetic algorithm for fluidized bed drying
    Nazghelichi, Tayyeb
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Kianmehr, Mohammad Hossein
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2011, 75 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [40] Harnessing the Influence of Pressure and Nutrients on Biological CO2 Methanation Using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm Approaches
    Chatzis, Alexandros
    Kontogiannopoulos, Konstantinos N.
    Dimitrakakis, Nikolaos
    Zouboulis, Anastasios
    Kougias, Panagiotis G.
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2025, 11 (01):