Forecasting bitcoin volatility: exploring the potential of deep learning

被引:4
|
作者
Pratas, Tiago E. [1 ]
Ramos, Filipe R. [2 ]
Rubio, Lihki [3 ]
机构
[1] ISCTE Univ Inst Lisbon, Dept Econ, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, CEAUL Ctr Estat & Aplicacoes, Campo Grande 016, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Norte, Dept Math & Stat, Barranquilla 081007, Colombia
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; Bitcoin; ARCH; GARCH models; Deep learning; Forecasting; Prediction error; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DIRECTION; JUMPS;
D O I
10.1007/s40822-023-00232-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate forecasting properties of classic methodologies (ARCH and GARCH models) in comparison with deep learning methodologies (MLP, RNN, and LSTM architectures) for predicting Bitcoin's volatility. As a new asset class with unique characteristics, Bitcoin's high volatility and structural breaks make forecasting challenging. Based on 2753 observations from 08-09-2014 to 01-05-2022, this study focuses on Bitcoin logarithmic returns. Results show that deep learning methodologies have advantages in terms of forecast quality, although significant computational costs are required. Although both MLP and RNN models produce smoother forecasts with less fluctuation, they fail to capture large spikes. The LSTM architecture, on the other hand, reacts strongly to such movements and tries to adjust its forecast accordingly. To compare forecasting accuracy at different horizons MAPE, MAE metrics are used. Diebold-Mariano tests were conducted to compare the forecast, confirming the superiority of deep learning methodologies. Overall, this study suggests that deep learning methodologies could provide a promising tool for forecasting Bitcoin returns (and therefore volatility), especially for short-term horizons.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 305
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forecasting returns volatility of cryptocurrency by applying various deep learning algorithms
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    Khan, Faridoon
    Shaikh, Parvez Ahmed
    FUTURE BUSINESS JOURNAL, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [32] Forecasting realized volatility of bitcoin returns: tail events and asymmetric loss
    Gkillas, Konstantinos
    Gupta, Rangan
    Pierdzioch, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2021, 27 (16): : 1626 - 1644
  • [33] FORECASTING BITCOIN VOLATILITY USING TWO-COMPONENT CARR MODEL
    Wu, Xinyu
    Niu, Shenghao
    Xie, Haibin
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2020, 54 (03): : 77 - 94
  • [34] Bitcoin Return Volatility Forecasting: A Comparative Study between GARCH and RNN
    Shen, Ze
    Wan, Qing
    Leatham, David J.
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (07)
  • [35] Forecasting Bitcoin volatility: A new insight from the threshold regression model
    Zhang, Yaojie
    He, Mengxi
    Wen, Danyan
    Wang, Yudong
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2022, 41 (03) : 633 - 652
  • [36] Forecasting Bitcoin Prices Using Deep Learning for Consumer-Centric Industrial Applications
    Roy, Pradeep Kumar
    Kumar, Abhinav
    Singh, Ashish
    Sangaiah, Arun Kumar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 2024, 70 (01) : 1351 - 1358
  • [37] Bitcoin Price Forecasting via Ensemble-based LSTM Deep Learning Networks
    Shin, MyungJae
    Mohaisen, David
    Kim, Joongheon
    35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION NETWORKING (ICOIN 2021), 2021, : 603 - 608
  • [38] Forecasting Bitcoin realized volatility by measuring the spillover effect among cryptocurrencies
    Qiu, Yue
    Wang, Yifan
    Xie, Tian
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 208
  • [39] Crude Oil Markets Volatility Forecasting: A Novel Deep Learning Hybrid Model
    Lin, Zixiao
    Tan, Bin
    Lin, Yu
    Lu, Qin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2025, 42 (02)
  • [40] Forecasting the Volatility of the Stock Index with Deep Learning Using Asymmetric Hurst Exponents
    Cho, Poongjin
    Lee, Minhyuk
    FRACTAL AND FRACTIONAL, 2022, 6 (07)