Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective

被引:23
|
作者
Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo [1 ]
Moreira, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Sch Engn, Dept Chem Engn, CRETUS, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Social life cycle assessment; Circular economy; Biorefinery; Bioenergy; S-LCA; Social sustainability; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUGARCANE; BIOMASS; MULTICRITERIA; TRANSITION; BIOETHANOL; INDICATORS; INSIGHTS; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2023.113162
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy is positioned as a sustainable pathway to address the climate crisis and decrease the con-sumption of fossil resources. Life cycle methodologies are recognised as useful tools for assessing sustainability issues of production and consumption patterns. Nevertheless, the Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) meth-odology is less explored despite its potential, although it is true that social sustainability assessment in promoting bioeconomy strategies requires more attention. This study describes the state of the art of the S-LCA methodology under the bioeconomy framework, critically analysing the main procedural and practical issues of its imple-mentation, and the eventual specificities, as well as providing some of the challenges for future studies. This review highlights methodological weaknesses that require further research, related to the definition of system boundaries and cut-off criteria, the method of impact assessment, and the selection of societal issues and stakeholders, as well as uncertainty, among others. In addition, particularities of the bioeconomy in the life perspective were noted, such as multifunctionality and allocation issues of bio-based products, as well as the strong interest in biofuel production systems. Therefore, more efforts are desirable to address the diversity of challenges towards the progress of the S-LCA method in line with other life cycle approaches (environmental and economic). However, the updated S-LCA Guidelines represent a useful and valuable starting point on the way towards a comprehensive (i.e., diverse social concerns) and standardised social assessment under a life cycle perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of social life-cycle performance of buildings: Theoretical framework and impact assessment approach
    Liu, Siyu
    Qian, Shunzhi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 792 - 807
  • [42] Industry 4.0-based dynamic Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment to target the social circular economy in manufacturing
    Garcia-Muina, Fernando
    Sonia Medina-Salgado, Maria
    Gonzalez-Sanchez, Rocio
    Huertas-Valdivia, Irene
    Ferrari, Anna Maria
    Settembre-Blundo, Davide
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 327
  • [43] Social Organizational Life Cycle Assessment: an approach for identification of relevant subcategories for wine production in Italy
    D'Eusanio, Manuela
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Petti, Luigia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (06) : 1119 - 1132
  • [44] Social Consideration in Product Life Cycle for Product Social Sustainability
    Kalvani, Somayeh Rezaei
    Sharaai, Amir Hamzah
    Abdullahi, Ibrahim Kabir
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [45] Social Life Cycle Assessment of Major Staple Grain Crops in China
    Wei, Jianing
    Cui, Jixiao
    Xu, Yinan
    Li, Jinna
    Lei, Xinyu
    Gao, Wangsheng
    Chen, Yuanquan
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [46] Social Sustainability Assessment in Livestock Production: A Social Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Rivera-Huerta, Adriana
    Rubio Lozano, Maria de la Salud
    Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro
    Patricia Guereca, Leonor
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
  • [47] Rebuilding or retrofitting? An assessment of social impacts using Social Life Cycle Assessment
    Josa, Irene
    Borrion, Aiduan
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 112
  • [48] Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment
    Traverso, Marzia
    Bell, Lynn
    Saling, Peter
    Fontes, Joao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03) : 597 - 606
  • [49] Implementing the guidelines for social life cycle assessment: past, present, and future
    Tokede, Olubukola
    Traverso, Marzia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10) : 1910 - 1929
  • [50] Social evaluation of municipal solid waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: a systematic literature review
    Costa, Alline Marchesin
    Mancini, Sandro Donnini
    Paes, Michel Xocaira
    Lie Ugaya, Cassia Maria
    de Medeiros, Gerson Araujo
    de Souza, Ricardo Gabbay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (05) : 719 - 739