Progress of social assessment in the framework of bioeconomy under a life cycle perspective

被引:23
|
作者
Rebolledo-Leiva, Ricardo [1 ]
Moreira, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Sch Engn, Dept Chem Engn, CRETUS, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Social life cycle assessment; Circular economy; Biorefinery; Bioenergy; S-LCA; Social sustainability; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; SUGARCANE; BIOMASS; MULTICRITERIA; TRANSITION; BIOETHANOL; INDICATORS; INSIGHTS; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2023.113162
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The bioeconomy is positioned as a sustainable pathway to address the climate crisis and decrease the con-sumption of fossil resources. Life cycle methodologies are recognised as useful tools for assessing sustainability issues of production and consumption patterns. Nevertheless, the Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) meth-odology is less explored despite its potential, although it is true that social sustainability assessment in promoting bioeconomy strategies requires more attention. This study describes the state of the art of the S-LCA methodology under the bioeconomy framework, critically analysing the main procedural and practical issues of its imple-mentation, and the eventual specificities, as well as providing some of the challenges for future studies. This review highlights methodological weaknesses that require further research, related to the definition of system boundaries and cut-off criteria, the method of impact assessment, and the selection of societal issues and stakeholders, as well as uncertainty, among others. In addition, particularities of the bioeconomy in the life perspective were noted, such as multifunctionality and allocation issues of bio-based products, as well as the strong interest in biofuel production systems. Therefore, more efforts are desirable to address the diversity of challenges towards the progress of the S-LCA method in line with other life cycle approaches (environmental and economic). However, the updated S-LCA Guidelines represent a useful and valuable starting point on the way towards a comprehensive (i.e., diverse social concerns) and standardised social assessment under a life cycle perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic literature review in social life cycle assessment
    Petti, Luigia
    Serreli, Monica
    Di Cesare, Silvia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03) : 422 - 431
  • [22] Lignin valorisation: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) considerations for enabling Circular Bioeconomy
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Koutinas, Michalis
    Georgali, Phoebe-Zoe
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2023, 42 (01) : 1008 - 1027
  • [23] Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward
    Di Cesare, Silvia
    Silveri, Federica
    Sala, Serenella
    Petti, Luigia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03) : 406 - 421
  • [24] Support Phosphorus Recycling Policy with Social Life Cycle Assessment: A Case of Japan
    Teah, Heng Yi
    Onuki, Motoharu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [25] A life cycle assessment perspective on biodiesel production from fish wastes for green microgrids in a circular bioeconomy
    Kiehbadroudinezhad, Mohammadali
    Merabet, Adel
    Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 21
  • [26] Development of a Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for manufacturing organizations
    Ruben, Ben R.
    Menon, Prasanth
    Sreedharan, Raja
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SOCIETY (POMS), 2018,
  • [27] The EU Bioeconomy Footprint: Using life cycle assessment to monitor environmental impacts of the EU Bioeconomy
    Sinkko, Taija
    Sanye-Mengual, Esther
    Corrado, Sara
    Giuntoli, Jacopo
    Sala, Serenella
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 37 : 169 - 179
  • [28] A Practical Approach for Social Life Cycle Assessment in the Automotive Industry
    Karlewski, Hannah
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Ruhland, Klaus
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [29] Working conditions in hydrogen production: A social life cycle assessment
    Werker, Jasmin
    Wulf, Christina
    Zapp, Petra
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2019, 23 (05) : 1052 - 1061
  • [30] A Framework to Evaluate the Social Life Cycle Impact of Products under the Circular Economy Thinking
    Tsalis, Thomas
    Stefanakis, Alexandros I.
    Nikolaou, Ioannis
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (04)