Organization and Performance of US Health Systems

被引:35
作者
Beaulieu, Nancy D. [1 ]
Chernew, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
McWilliams, J. Michael [1 ,3 ]
Landrum, Mary Beth [1 ]
Dalton, Maurice [2 ]
Gu, Angela Yutong [2 ]
Briskin, Michael [2 ]
Wu, Rachel [2 ]
El Idrissi, Zakaria El Amrani [2 ]
Machado, Helene [2 ]
Hicks, Andrew L. [1 ]
Cutler, David M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2023年 / 329卷 / 04期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-CARE; PHYSICIAN PRACTICES; PROVIDER CONSOLIDATION; MARKET CONCENTRATION; HOSPITAL OWNERSHIP; HIGHER PRICES; INTEGRATION; DELIVERY; MERGERS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2022.24032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Health systems play a central role in the delivery of health care, but relatively little is known about these organizations and their performance. OBJECTIVE To (1) identify and describe health systems in the United States; (2) assess differences between physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems; and (3) compare quality and cost of care delivered by physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems. EVIDENCE REVIEW Health systems were defined as groups of commonly owned or managed entities that included at least 1 general acute care hospital, 10 primary care physicians, and 50 total physicians located within a single hospital referral region. They were identified using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrative data, Internal Revenue Service filings, Medicare and commercial claims, and other data. Health systems were categorized as academic, public, large for-profit, large nonprofit, or other private systems. Quality of preventive care, chronic disease management, patient experience, low-value care, mortality, hospital readmissions, and spending were assessed for Medicare beneficiaries attributed to system and nonsystem physicians. Prices for physician and hospital services and total spending were assessed in 2018 commercial claims data. Outcomes were adjusted for patient characteristics and geographic area. FINDINGS A total of 580 health systems were identified and varied greatly in size. Systems accounted for 40% of physicians and 84% of general acute care hospital beds and delivered primary care to 41% of traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Academic and large nonprofit systems accounted for a majority of system physicians (80%) and system hospital beds (64%). System hospitals were larger than nonsystem hospitals (67% vs 23% with >100 beds), as were system physician practices ( 74% vs 12% with >100 physicians). Performance on measures of preventive care, clinical quality, and patient experience was modestly higher for health system physicians and hospitals than for nonsystem physicians and hospitals. Prices paid to health system physicians and hospitals were significantly higher than prices paid to nonsystem physicians and hospitals (12%-26% higher for physician services, 31% for hospital services). Adjusting for practice size attenuated health systems differences on quality measures, but price differences for small and medium practices remained large. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In 2018, health system physicians and hospitals delivered a large portion of medical services. Performance on clinical quality and patient experience measures was marginally better in systems but spending and prices were substantially higher. This was especially true for small practices. Small quality differentials combined with large price differentials suggests that health systems have not, on average, realized their potential for better care at equal or lower cost.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 335
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, COMP HLTH SYST PERF
[2]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, COMP US HLTH SYST
[3]  
Ahluwalia SC, 2017, JT COMM J QUAL PATIE, V43, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.010
[4]   Are Changes in Medical Group Practice Characteristics Over Time Associated With Medicare Spending and Quality of Care? [J].
Baker, Laurence C. ;
Pesko, Michael ;
Ramsay, Patricia ;
Casalino, Lawrence P. ;
Shortell, Stephen M. .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2020, 77 (05) :402-415
[5]   Vertical Integration: Hospital Ownership Of Physician Practices Is Associated With Higher Prices And Spending [J].
Baker, Laurence C. ;
Bundorf, M. Kate ;
Kessler, Daniel P. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2014, 33 (05) :756-763
[6]   Changes in Quality of Care after Hospital Mergers and Acquisitions [J].
Beaulieu, Nancy D. ;
Dafny, Leemore S. ;
Landon, Bruce E. ;
Dalton, Jesse B. ;
Kuye, Ifedayo ;
McWilliams, J. Michael .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (01) :51-59
[7]  
Bishop TF, 2016, AM J MANAG CARE, V22, P172
[8]   The effect of hospital acquisitions of physician practices on prices and spending [J].
Capps, Cory ;
Dranove, David ;
Ody, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 59 :139-152
[9]   The impact of provider consolidation on physician prices [J].
Carlin, Caroline S. ;
Feldman, Roger ;
Dowd, Bryan .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (12) :1789-1806
[10]   Medical Group Characteristics and the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries [J].
Casalino, Lawrence P. ;
Ramsay, Patricia ;
Baker, Laurence C. ;
Pesko, Michael F. ;
Shortell, Stephen M. .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 53 (06) :4970-4996