Temporal interference current stimulation in peripheral nerves is not driven by envelope extraction

被引:8
作者
Budde, Ryan B. [1 ]
Williams, Michael T. [2 ]
Irazoqui, Pedro P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
temporal interference; neuromodulation; peripheral nerve stimulation; deep brain stimulation; VAGUS NERVE; EPILEPSY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/acc6f1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background. Electrical neuromodulation remains an effective therapy for multiple neurological disorders. One strategy to electrically stimulate nerves utilizes the interference of multiple high frequency waveforms. This technique, known as temporal interference stimulation or interferential current stimulation, has recently gained significant attention as a method to improve the state-of-the-art in neurostimulation in both animal studies and human clinical trials. Objective. Here we report our investigation into the fundamental properties of the neuronal response to these types of waveforms-the effects of carrier and envelope frequencies, thresholds, firing behavior, and phase and asymmetric interference patterns. Methods. We utilized a cuff electrode on the rat sciatic nerve to apply a variety of interferential signals. We recorded muscle activity in the plantar muscles and biceps femoris, which are proxies for activity on two of the major branches of the sciatic, which are spatially distinct in the target volume. We tested both fundamental recruitment properties as well as spatial techniques to selectively activate either muscle group. Results. Our data suggest, contrary to the currently accepted explanation, that neurons do not extract envelopes at all, and that the response to these signals is well explained by a resistor-capacitor (i.e. integrator) membrane with a fixed firing threshold. Basic interference techniques do not change recruitment far from electrodes. Techniques can produce regions of both phasic activation and tonic activation/conduction block. Conclusions. An integrator model suggests that interference techniques are less capable of minimally invasive stimulation for a subcortical brain target than previously thought. Human clinical trials using these techniques should reevaluate their methods. Interference stimulation allows significant target selectivity in a peripheral cuff electrode with targets near electrodes. These techniques can allow spatially distinct regions of phasic firing, tonic firing, conduction block, and no effect.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized, controlled acute phase trial
    Rush, AJ
    Marangell, LB
    Sackeim, HA
    George, MS
    Brannan, SK
    Davis, SM
    Howland, R
    Kling, MA
    Rittberg, BR
    Burke, WJ
    Rapaport, MH
    Zajecka, J
    Nierenberg, AA
    Husain, MM
    Ginsberg, D
    Cooke, RG
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 58 (05) : 347 - 354
  • [32] Neurostimulation for Treatment of Migraine and Cluster Headache
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    Vargas, Bert
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (09) : 1827 - 1834
  • [33] Mirrored enhanced Howland current source with feedback control
    Sirtoli, Vinicius Grando
    Vincence, Volney Coelho
    Bertemes-Filho, Pedro
    [J]. REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2019, 90 (02)
  • [34] Block of external urethral sphincter contraction by high frequency electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve
    Tai, CF
    Roppolo, JR
    De Groat, WC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) : 2069 - 2072
  • [35] Precise Temporal Control of Interferential Neural Stimulation via Phase Modulation
    Terasawa, Yasuo
    Tashiro, Hiroyuki
    Ueno, Tokio
    Ohta, Jun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 69 (01) : 220 - 228
  • [36] Learnings from 30 years of reported efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy treatment: A critical review
    Toffa, Denahin Hinnoutondji
    Touma, Lahoud
    El Meskine, Tahir
    Bouthillier, Alain
    Dang Khoa Nguyen
    [J]. SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2020, 83 : 104 - 123
  • [37] Responses of model cortical neurons to temporal interference stimulation and related transcranial alternating current stimulation modalities
    Wang, Boshuo
    Aberra, Aman S.
    Grill, Warren M.
    Peterchev, Angel, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (06)
  • [38] Development of a Non-invasive Deep Brain Stimulator With Precise Positioning and Real-Time Monitoring of Bioimpedance
    Wang, Heng
    Shi, Zhongyan
    Sun, Weiqian
    Zhang, Jianxu
    Wang, Jing
    Shi, Yue
    Yang, Ruoshui
    Li, Chunlin
    Chen, Duanduan
    Wu, Jinglong
    Gongyao, Guo
    Xu, Yifei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2020, 14
  • [39] Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Autonomic Control and Attenuates Systemic Inflammation and Heart Failure Progression in a Canine High-Rate Pacing Model
    Zhang, Youhua
    Popovic, Zoran B.
    Bibevski, Steve
    Fakhry, Itaf
    Sica, Domenic A.
    Van Wagoner, David R.
    Mazgalev, Todor N.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2009, 2 (06) : 692 - 699
  • [40] Multi-Point Temporal Interference Stimulation by Using Each Electrode to Carry Different Frequency Currents
    Zhu, Xiaoqi
    Li, Youjun
    Zheng, Liang
    Shao, Bixin
    Liu, Xun
    Li, Chenxi
    Huang, Zi-Gang
    Liu, Tian
    Wang, Jue
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 168839 - 168848