Temporal interference current stimulation in peripheral nerves is not driven by envelope extraction

被引:8
作者
Budde, Ryan B. [1 ]
Williams, Michael T. [2 ]
Irazoqui, Pedro P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
temporal interference; neuromodulation; peripheral nerve stimulation; deep brain stimulation; VAGUS NERVE; EPILEPSY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/acc6f1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background. Electrical neuromodulation remains an effective therapy for multiple neurological disorders. One strategy to electrically stimulate nerves utilizes the interference of multiple high frequency waveforms. This technique, known as temporal interference stimulation or interferential current stimulation, has recently gained significant attention as a method to improve the state-of-the-art in neurostimulation in both animal studies and human clinical trials. Objective. Here we report our investigation into the fundamental properties of the neuronal response to these types of waveforms-the effects of carrier and envelope frequencies, thresholds, firing behavior, and phase and asymmetric interference patterns. Methods. We utilized a cuff electrode on the rat sciatic nerve to apply a variety of interferential signals. We recorded muscle activity in the plantar muscles and biceps femoris, which are proxies for activity on two of the major branches of the sciatic, which are spatially distinct in the target volume. We tested both fundamental recruitment properties as well as spatial techniques to selectively activate either muscle group. Results. Our data suggest, contrary to the currently accepted explanation, that neurons do not extract envelopes at all, and that the response to these signals is well explained by a resistor-capacitor (i.e. integrator) membrane with a fixed firing threshold. Basic interference techniques do not change recruitment far from electrodes. Techniques can produce regions of both phasic activation and tonic activation/conduction block. Conclusions. An integrator model suggests that interference techniques are less capable of minimally invasive stimulation for a subcortical brain target than previously thought. Human clinical trials using these techniques should reevaluate their methods. Interference stimulation allows significant target selectivity in a peripheral cuff electrode with targets near electrodes. These techniques can allow spatially distinct regions of phasic firing, tonic firing, conduction block, and no effect.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Evolution of the Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System Technology for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
    Afra, Pegah
    Adamolekun, Bola
    Aydemir, Seyhmus
    Watson, Glenn David Robert
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 3
  • [2] A computational study to evaluate the activation pattern of nerve fibers in response to interferential currents stimulation
    Agharezaee, Mahsa
    Mahnam, Amin
    [J]. MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2015, 53 (08) : 713 - 720
  • [3] Mirrored Modified Howland Circuit for Bioimpedance Applications: Analytical Analysis
    Bertemes-Filho, P.
    Negri, L. H.
    Felipe, A.
    Vincence, V. C.
    [J]. FIRST LATIN-AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON BIOIMPEDANCE (CLABIO 2012), 2012, 407
  • [4] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 2020, DEV HUM TRANSL TEMP
  • [5] Brown J., 2022, TEMPORAL INTERFERENC
  • [6] Quantitative investigations of electrical nerve excitation treated as polarization (Reprinted from Journal de Physiologie et de Pathologie Generale, vol 9, pg 620-635, 1907)
    Brunel, Nicolas
    van Rossum, Mark C. W.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2007, 97 (5-6) : 341 - 349
  • [7] Budde R B., 2023, DATA ASS PUBLICATION, DOI [10.7281/T1/VZYIRV, DOI 10.7281/T1/VZYIRV]
  • [8] Vagus nerve stimulation in ischemic stroke: old wine in a new bottle
    Cai, Peter Y.
    Bodhit, Aakash
    Derequito, Roselle
    Ansari, Saeed
    Abukhalil, Fawzi
    Thenkabail, Spandana
    Ganji, Sarah
    Saravanapavan, Pradeepan
    Shekar, Chandana C.
    Bidari, Sharatchandra
    Waters, Michael F.
    Hedna, Vishnumurthy Shushrutha
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2014, 5 : 107
  • [9] STIMULUS: Noninvasive Dynamic Patterns of Neurostimulation Using Spatio-Temporal Interference
    Cao, Jiaming
    Grover, Pulkit
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (03) : 726 - 737
  • [10] Vagus Nerve Stimulation and the Cardiovascular System
    Capilupi, Michael J.
    Kerath, Samantha M.
    Becker, Lance B.
    [J]. COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (02):