Teachers' barriers dealing with environmental education programs' implementation in Greek secondary schools

被引:6
作者
Ntona, Eirini [1 ,5 ]
Georgopoulos, Alexandros [2 ]
Malandrakis, Georgios [3 ]
Ragkou, Polyxeni [4 ]
机构
[1] Environm Educ Ctr Grevena, End Taliadouri Str, Grevena, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Educ, Dept Early Childhood Educ, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Educ, Dept Primary Educ, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Agr Forestry & Nat Environm, Dept Forestry & Nat Environm, Lamia, TK, Greece
[5] Environm Educ Ctr Grevena, End taliadouri Str, Grevena 51100, Greece
关键词
EE barriers; structural and financial factors; pedagogical and epistemological perceptions; educational system orientation; GROUNDED THEORY; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2023.2182257
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study highlights the barriers that secondary teachers in Greece face dealing with the implementation of Environmental Education programs throughout a period of more than 30 years in the Greek educational system. Participants were 20 secondary teachers, emanating from various disciplines. Seven were "senior" teachers, having implemented EE projects before its official institutionalization, in 1990, and 13 were "junior", meaning that they implemented EE projects during the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). In-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were used to identify teachers' views about the barriers they faced regarding changes or transformations in the realization of EE during the periods under focus. Collected data were subjected to grounded theory analysis and revealed that there were similarities and differences concerning the barriers encountered in the periods of study. Barriers are of structural, financial and economic nature as well as pedagogical and epistemological. These refer to the position of EE into the secondary schools and to the orientation of the school within the general educational system. Results indicate rather a restriction of EE into schools instead of expansion and flourishment following the international progress made, in theoretical and practical level, and the experience that have been gained worldwide after decades of practicing.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 719
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]  
Gaudiano Gonzalez., 2007, Environmental Education Research, V13, P155, DOI DOI 10.1080/13504620701295684
[22]  
Georgopoulos A., 2014, ENV ED ISSUES IDENTI
[23]   Taking stock of environmental education policy in England - the what, the where and the why [J].
Glackin, Melissa ;
King, Heather .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (03) :305-323
[24]  
Goupos T., 2001, ENV ED, V21, P13
[25]  
Ham S., 1988, The Journal of Environmental Education, V19, P17, DOI [10.1080/00958964.1988.9942751, DOI 10.1080/00958964.1988.9942751]
[26]   Building face, construct, and content validity through use of a modified Delphi: adapting grounded theory to build an environmental field days observation tool [J].
Heimlich, Joe E. ;
Carlson, Stephan P. ;
Storksdieck, Martin .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2011, 17 (03) :287-305
[28]   Teachers' environmental education as creating cracks and ruptures in school education: a narrative inquiry and an analysis of teacher rhetoric [J].
Hwang, Seyoung .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (06) :697-714
[29]  
Kabassi K, 2021, Applied Environmental Education & Communication, V20, P270, DOI [10.1080/1533015x.2020.1851315, DOI 10.1080/1533015X.2020.1851315]
[30]   Leading sustainable schools: exploring the role of primary school principals [J].
Kadji-Beltran, Chrysanthi ;
Zachariou, Aravella ;
Stevenson, Robert B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (03) :303-323