Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Masses-A Feasibility Study

被引:1
作者
Shi, Haiyuan [1 ]
Chee, Charlyn Chai Hoon [2 ]
Seng, Angela Peck Ying [2 ]
Koh, Xuan Han [3 ]
Teoh, Wey Chyi [1 ]
Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiog, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Specialist Camden Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
complex cystic and solid breast masses; complex breast cysts; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; breast imaging; TUMOR VASCULARITY; DOPPLER; SONOGRAPHY; US;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbae007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Complex cystic and solid breast mass (CCSBM) is a radiological diagnosis based on grayscale B-mode sonographic features. Because of potential for malignancy, biopsy is typically recommended. We examined the feasibility of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) as a tool to identify benign CCSBMs.Methods This Institutional Review Board-approved prospective observational study performed targeted CEUS of 14 CCSBMs that were subsequently biopsied. CEUS images were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to other sonographic features, noting presence or absence of enhancement and time to perceived optimal enhancement. Interobserver agreement for presence or absence of enhancement was analyzed using Cohen's kappa coefficient. From retrospective review of initial diagnostic US examinations, descriptive CCSBM sizes, subtypes, and Doppler information were recorded. Histopathologies were categorized as benign, benign with upgrade potential (BWUP), and malignant. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CIs were calculated for CEUS enhancement.Results Of 14 CCSBMs, 12 were nonmalignant (9 benign, 3 BWUP) and 2 were malignant. There was perfect interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa 1.00) between the 2 readers for CEUS enhancement. CEUS was 100% sensitive, 25% specific, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.625 (95% CI, 0.50-0.75) in differentiating nonmalignant from malignant lesions. It was 100% sensitive, 33.3% specific, with an AUROC of 0.667 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) in differentiating benign from surgically significant (BWUP and malignant) CCSBMs.Conclusion This small feasibility study highlighted the potential of CEUS as a safe noninvasive tool to identify the proportion of CCSBMs that are benign and can avoid tissue biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for complex cystic focal liver lesions: blinded reader study
    Lin, Man-Xia
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    Lu, Ming-De
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Chen, Li-Da
    Xu, Zuo-Feng
    Liu, Guang-Jian
    Xie, Xiao-Hua
    Liang, Jin-Yu
    Wang, Zhu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 358 - 369
  • [42] Accuracy of conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the size of breast cancer
    Shi, Xian-Quan
    Dong, Yunyun
    Tan, Xiaoqu
    Yang, Peipei
    Wang, Chunmei
    Feng, Wei
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Qian, Linxue
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2022, 82 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [43] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal cystic lesions: an update
    Masino, Federica
    Eusebi, Laura
    Bertolotto, Michele
    Pizzileo, Sara Maria
    Pizzolorusso, Francesco
    Sortino, Giuseppe
    Pitoni, Lucia
    Santarelli, Stefano
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2024, 51 (04) : 635 - 647
  • [44] Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Renal Cystic Mass
    Xia, Qingqing
    Yuan, Xinchun
    Huang, Meifeng
    Zhou, Xiling
    Zhou, Zhiyu
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (03) : 292 - 298
  • [45] Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid®
    Masayo Haga
    Toshiko Hirai
    Tokiko Nakai
    Toyoki Kobayashi
    Takashi Nakamura
    Aki Marugami
    Takahiro Ito
    Megumi Takewa
    Nagaaki Marugami
    Kimihiko Kichikawa
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2020, 47 : 591 - 601
  • [46] The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of scrotal trauma: a review
    Yusuf, Gibran T.
    Rafailidis, Vasileios
    Moore, Stephen
    Hawthorn, Benjamin
    Fang, Cheng
    Huang, Dean Y.
    Sellars, Maria E.
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [47] Feasibility of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions: Image quality evaluation and correlation of quantification with two-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Cao, Jiaying
    Dong, Yi
    Fan, Peili
    Mao, Feng
    Wang, Wenping
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 72 (03) : 305 - 316
  • [48] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound
    Xu, Jing
    Huang, Zeping
    Zeng, Jie
    Zheng, Zhijuan
    Cao, Junyan
    Su, Manting
    Zhang, Xinling
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 49 (07) : 1527 - 1534
  • [49] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for complex cystic focal liver lesions: blinded reader study
    Man-Xia Lin
    Hui-Xiong Xu
    Ming-De Lu
    Xiao-Yan Xie
    Li-Da Chen
    Zuo-Feng Xu
    Guang-Jian Liu
    Xiao-Hua Xie
    Jin-Yu Liang
    Zhu Wang
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 358 - 369
  • [50] Prospective evaluation of CT indeterminate renal masses using US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Nicolau, Carlos
    Bunesch, Laura
    Pano, Blanca
    Salvador, Rafael
    Jose Ribal, Maria
    Mallofre, Carme
    Sebastia, Carmen
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (03): : 542 - 551